[ALT-Plus] [ALAC-Members] ICANN64 planning - reminder - urgent
Marita Moll
mmoll at ca.inter.net
Wed Jan 16 20:36:44 UTC 2019
Yes, makes sense to me too. I have found that strategic plans really do
drive corporate agendas and it is important to express, before they are
set in stone, what you think that direction should be.
Marita
On 1/16/2019 6:54 AM, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
> Makes sense
>
> Jonathan Zuck
> Executive Director
> Innovators Network Foundation
> www.Innovatorsnetwork.org <http://www.Innovatorsnetwork.org>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* ALT-Plus <alt-plus-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Holly
> Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2019 4:18:57 AM
> *To:* Maureen Hilyard
> *Cc:* ALAC-members at icann.org; alt-plus at icann.org; Marita Moll
> *Subject:* Re: [ALT-Plus] [ALAC-Members] ICANN64 planning - reminder -
> urgent
> Thanks Maureen
>
> My thoughts were to talk through the various stuff we do or would like
> to do, and see how it ties in with the Strategic Plan’s objectives.
> That way, when we ask for the Board’s views, we’ll have stuff to say
> in reply - AND material to use in arguing for funding for various projects
>
> Holly
>
>> On Jan 16, 2019, at 6:39 PM, Maureen Hilyard
>> <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com <mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I think we could certainly organise a 60 minute session to talk about
>> the new strategic plan. Its is easy to put it into our schedule. but
>> we do need to have a plan about what and how we propose to discuss
>> issues people want to raise, but also what we aim to achieve at the
>> end of our discussion.
>>
>> It would possibly be better to hold this early in the week, so that
>> we have something to propose for Xavier (as a financial issue) and
>> also something for Theresa Swineheart for the strategic direction in
>> perhaps in one of our later ALAC sessions.
>>
>> M
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:32 PM Holly Raiche
>> <h.raiche at internode.on.net <mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marita
>>
>> My suggestion is to do both: We should discuss what we believe
>> the Objectives mean for us. But I would also think it useful to
>> have a Board view - or indeed Xavier’s view. After all, when any
>> of us applies for ICANN funds, it should be tied back to
>> assisting in achieving ICANN’s Strategic Objectives - in which
>> case understanding how those Objectives are viewed from
>> Management would be helpful.
>>
>> Holly
>>
>>> On Jan 16, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net
>>> <mailto:mmoll at ca.inter.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would be more interested in us presenting ideas on how we
>>> might assist than asking for suggestions from them. No harm in
>>> it, I suppose, but would not expect much in the way of response.
>>>
>>> Marita
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/15/2019 10:22 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
>>>> Marita and Maureen
>>>>
>>>> What about this as one of the questions for the Board? How do
>>>> they see ALAC assisting in the Strategic Objectives? - with
>>>> reference to what Marita has quoted
>>>>
>>>> Holly
>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 12, 2019, at 2:23 AM, Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net
>>>>> <mailto:mmoll at ca.inter.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> We might want to narrow it a bit. I was talking specifically
>>>>> about the governance parts of the strategic plan. It is all
>>>>> relevant but it is 2.2 that I think we need to pay particular
>>>>> attention to -- strengthen how I would ask, for whom and to
>>>>> what end.
>>>>>
>>>>> /TO ACHIEVE THIS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE, ICANN SEEKS TO:
>>>>> /
>>>>>
>>>>> /2.1. Address the increasing needs of inclusivity,
>>>>> accountability and transparency, while at the same time
>>>>> ensuring that work gets done and policies are developed in
>>>>> an effective and timely manner/
>>>>>
>>>>> /2.2 Strengthen ICANN’s multistakeholder decision-making
>>>>> process./
>>>>>
>>>>> /2.3 Strengthen the inclusivity and openness of ICANN’s
>>>>> multistakeholder model by improving and sustaining diverse
>>>>> representation and active, effective participatio/
>>>>>
>>>>> Great if you can facilitate Maureen. And any session on this
>>>>> topic would be interesting, but I would argue for a focussed
>>>>> session -- how does ALAC see the multistakeholder session
>>>>> strengthened? We can put up some straw ideas. See where they go.
>>>>>
>>>>> Marita
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/11/2019 9:59 AM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>>>>>> Sounds like a plan, Marita
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For this we could plan a _90 minute session_ for an At-Large
>>>>>> workshop to discuss _ICANN's Strategic Plan_ (as a title). _I
>>>>>> could be the Facilitator_ with different ALAC members raising
>>>>>> a section of interest that they may want to get some feedback
>>>>>> from At-Large. And an At-Large submission can come out of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the type of information we need at this time, so that
>>>>>> we can slot it into the ICANN schedule and develop further
>>>>>> once it is in place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> M
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:36 AM Marita Moll
>>>>>> <mmoll at ca.inter.net <mailto:mmoll at ca.inter.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am completely unsure about where we left off in the
>>>>>> last planning meeting -- did we formally agree on topics.
>>>>>> There were only a few participants and there are often
>>>>>> many plans, ideas, etc. already in the pipeline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been on so many calls this week that they are
>>>>>> starting to merge.:-( It is possible that I was part of a
>>>>>> discussion around a session on the strategic plan --
>>>>>> specifically around the multistakeholder system section
>>>>>> of that plan -- that was supported by Cheryl L-O. But not
>>>>>> sure if that might be already well covered in the meeting
>>>>>> generally. Will it still be useful for ALAC to have its
>>>>>> own session on that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Around that idea, we discussed the need to have a
>>>>>> formally facilitated session recording people's ideas
>>>>>> that would make it possible to come out of it with some
>>>>>> kind of report. The use of flip charts and yellow
>>>>>> stickies was encouraged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this is on, I will put some details on it. Let me
>>>>>> know. Also, do we have any experienced facilitators
>>>>>> around the table or can we bring one in?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marita
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/11/2019 8:20 AM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to the small group who came to the Planning
>>>>>>> meeting. It is really important that if you have offered
>>>>>>> to prepare a workshop or information session or a
>>>>>>> meeting during our traditional ALAC and Regional Leaders
>>>>>>> Working sessions to be held at ICANN 64 that we get some
>>>>>>> information from you asap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was suggested in Barcelona that we do something
>>>>>>> different during these sessions but this will only work
>>>>>>> if everyone shares in the planning and undertaking of
>>>>>>> these sessions. This availability is open to ALAC and
>>>>>>> RALO leaders, ALT+ members and other WG Chairs (with
>>>>>>> their co-Chairs).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *However, the scheduling of these sessions is now quite
>>>>>>> urgent to fit it into the main ICANN schedule.* It is
>>>>>>> therefore important that we get some confirmation of the
>>>>>>> title and chair and an idea of the content of the
>>>>>>> proposed session so we can organise some appropriate
>>>>>>> timing. It will make our programme look more interesting
>>>>>>> than having them all as "ALAC and Regional Chairs
>>>>>>> Working Session" although we will have some of these as
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the moment our working sessions have been scheduled for:
>>>>>>> Saturday 9am to 6.30pm (includes leadership training
>>>>>>> 1pm-3pm)
>>>>>>> Sunday 8.30am to 6pm
>>>>>>> Monday 1.30pm to 3pm
>>>>>>> Tuesday 8.30 to 6pm
>>>>>>> Wednesday 8.30 to 6pm (with Board meeting @ 8.30am to
>>>>>>> 9.30am, GAC meeting @ 11,30am to 12.15pm and AFRALO
>>>>>>> meeting @ 1.30pm to 3pm)
>>>>>>> Thursday 8.30 to 10.15am (Wrap-up and Debrief)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As a guide. some pointers that have been discussed:
>>>>>>> 1. Title of your activity - not too long but specific to
>>>>>>> give us all a clear indication of the content of the
>>>>>>> session.
>>>>>>> 2, Ensure that your speakers you have invited are aware
>>>>>>> of what will be involved in your session and what their
>>>>>>> expected input is. If they have a time preference please
>>>>>>> let us know so that we can give them.priority for their
>>>>>>> time slot
>>>>>>> 3. Sessions will normally be 30-60 mins (except for the
>>>>>>> policy sessions) but we need your workplan for your
>>>>>>> session so that we can decide on its final timeframe in
>>>>>>> order to fit everything into our schedule
>>>>>>> 4. Gisella needs to get information about your session
>>>>>>> and its title asap, for the main schedule and so that we
>>>>>>> can plan our other sessions around them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing from you. Please reply to
>>>>>>> this thread.
>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> ALAC-Members mailing list
>>>>>>> ALAC-Members at icann.org <mailto:ALAC-Members at icann.org>
>>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-members
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ALAC-Members mailing list
>>>>> ALAC-Members at icann.org <mailto:ALAC-Members at icann.org>
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-members
>>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/alt-plus/attachments/20190116/f0e0c238/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ALT-Plus
mailing list