[AT-Review] FW: AoC External Expert RFP

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Just a tiny follow up from our last meeting I did (as I stated I would and
got you permission to) share our list of names and email addresses with
Ralph McKay from Big Pulse (but only recently-  was a tad busy ;-( )   So
that we can review and test a sample survey set of the Public Comment
questions with the aim of harvesting metrics as a snapshot benchmark... So
please be aware that if you get an email from Ralph / BigPulse giving you
log on or poll / voting credentials  this is to allow us to test and play
with the sample system... I did include Olof & Alice in that listing, as
well as non appointed (invited) members...

We might wish to discuss merits of this option in our meeting Agenda in
Brussels.

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 11 June 2010 12:45, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org> wrote:

>  Dear RT,
>
>
>
> Find enclosed an additional bidder’s question:
>
>    - *The RFP could be construed to imply, but does not directly state,
>    that ICANN is looking for responses that name a specific individual as
>    opposed to an organization or a team.  The schedule and the nature of the
>    work involved would suggest a small team (2 to 3 researchers) in order to
>    conduct the necessary interviews, reviews, and analysis. Can you give any
>    guidance on this point?*
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Alice
>
>
>
> *From:* Christopher Owens [mailto:chris at interisle.net]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 11, 2010 12:01 AM
> *To:* Alice Jansen
> *Subject:* AoC External Expert RFP
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> We intend to submit a response to the RFP entitled "External Support for
> the A&T Review Process"
>
>
>
>    - Would e-mail transmission of an RSP response at approximately 1800
>    USEDT on Friday June 11 be considered compliant with the due date?
>    - *The RFP could be construed to imply, but does not directly state,
>    that ICANN is looking for responses that name a specific individual as
>    opposed to an organization or a team.  The schedule and the nature of the
>    work involved would suggest a small team (2 to 3 researchers) in order to
>    conduct the necessary interviews, reviews, and analysis. Can you give any
>    guidance on this point?*
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Chris Owens
>
> Founding Principal
>
> Interisle Consulting Group., LLC
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100611/951bb1df/attachment.html