[AT-Review] FW: AoC External Expert RFP

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Cheryl ..
I had this on my followup notes from our previous call but forgot to raise it during this call !!
 
--Manal

________________________________

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Sent: Fri 11/06/2010 07:59 AM
To: at-review at icann.org
Cc: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] FW: AoC External Expert RFP


Just a tiny follow up from our last meeting I did (as I stated I would and got you permission to) share our list of names and email addresses with Ralph McKay from Big Pulse (but only recently-  was a tad busy ;-( )   So that we can review and test a sample survey set of the Public Comment questions with the aim of harvesting metrics as a snapshot benchmark... So please be aware that if you get an email from Ralph / BigPulse giving you log on or poll / voting credentials  this is to allow us to test and play with the sample system... I did include Olof & Alice in that listing, as well as non appointed (invited) members... 

We might wish to discuss merits of this option in our meeting Agenda in Brussels.


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)




On 11 June 2010 12:45, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org> wrote:


	Dear RT,

	 

	Find enclosed an additional bidder's question:

	*	The RFP could be construed to imply, but does not directly state, that ICANN is looking for responses that name a specific individual as opposed to an organization or a team.  The schedule and the nature of the work involved would suggest a small team (2 to 3 researchers) in order to conduct the necessary interviews, reviews, and analysis. Can you give any guidance on this point? 

	Thank you,

	 

	Best regards

	 

	Alice

	 

	From: Christopher Owens [mailto:chris at interisle.net] 
	Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 12:01 AM
	To: Alice Jansen
	Subject: AoC External Expert RFP

	 

	Greetings,

	 

	We intend to submit a response to the RFP entitled "External Support for the A&T Review Process"

	 

	*	Would e-mail transmission of an RSP response at approximately 1800 USEDT on Friday June 11 be considered compliant with the due date? 
	*	The RFP could be construed to imply, but does not directly state, that ICANN is looking for responses that name a specific individual as opposed to an organization or a team.  The schedule and the nature of the work involved would suggest a small team (2 to 3 researchers) in order to conduct the necessary interviews, reviews, and analysis. Can you give any guidance on this point? 

	 

	Thank you, 

	 

	Chris Owens

	Founding Principal

	Interisle Consulting Group., LLC

	 

	 


	_______________________________________________
	AT-Review mailing list
	AT-Review at icann.org
	https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review