[AT-Review] Proposed Working Group Structure ..

Manal Ismail manal at tra.gov.eg
Sat Jun 19 21:44:36 UTC 2010


 
Dear All, 
 
Please find attached the working groups reflecting members who have volunteered for each ..
Please let me know if I have overlooked or misunderstood any of the requests ..
 
Kind Regards
 
--Manal 

________________________________

من: Erick Iriarte Ahon [mailto:eiriarte at lactld.org]
تاريخ الإرسال: السبت 19/06/2010 12:03 م
إلى: Manal Ismail
نسخة: at-review at icann.org
الموضوع: Re: [AT-Review] Proposed Working Group Structure ..



Hi

I would like to serve in groups 2 and 3

Erick

El 19/06/2010, a las 03:12, Manal Ismail escribi?:

> Thanks Becky ..
> As per today's discussion, we have agreed on having one more team on Independent Review of Board - IRB as suggested by Warren ..
>
> Volunteers for the four teams are currently as follows:
>
> Team #1 - Board Performance: Fabio, Olivier, Zhang, Willie
>
> Team #2 - GAC Role: Fabio, Zhang, Manal, Larry, Willie
>
> Team #3 - Community/Stakeholder engagement: Warren, Cheryl, Olivier, louie
>
> Team #4 - Independent Review of Board: Warren, Cheryl, louie, Larry
>
> It's worth noting that Peter has abstained from joining any of the groups ..
> Since not everyone was present in the room we may still have more volunteers ..
>
> I think a next step would be each group submitting a few bullets identifying the scope of work of the team and designating a point of contact for this team ..
>
> I hope this sounds fine ..
>
> Kind Regards
>
> --Manal
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> من: at-review-bounces at icann.org بالنيابة عن Burr, Becky
> تاريخ الإرسال: الجمعة 18/06/2010 06:23 م
> إلى: at-review at icann.org
> الموضوع: [AT-Review] with apologies to Warren and Peter,and in the interests of time, my cut at the working group structure
>
>
>
> Proposed Working Group Structure
>
>
>
> Three working groups will be set up to drive the AT-Review Team’s work in each of the areas set forth in the Affirmation of Commitments.  The relevant working group would take the lead on data gathering, analysis, and initial assessment, based on agreed upon performance metrics and considering, among other things, the degree to which ICANN's decisions are embraced, supported and accepted by relevant stakeholders. 
>
>
>
> Team # 1.  Board performance, including governance, selection, composition (necessary skill set mix), accessibility, decision-making, and dispute resolution/complaint handling, and independent review of Board decisions.
>
>
>
> Team # 2.  GAC role, including interactions with Board and community, the existence of shared and clearly understood expectations with respect to the GAC’s role in ICANN’s decision-making processes,  the quality and actionability of GAC input, and ICANN’s responsiveness to that input.
>
>
>
> Team # 3. Community/Stakeholder engagement, including effectiveness and quality of ICANN support for the policy development process, the quality of PDP output and the extent to which the ICANN PDP develops consensus, including across stakeholder groups, the level and quality of public input into the ICANN process, and the extent to which such input is reflected in ICANN decision-making.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> J. Beckwith Burr | WilmerHale
> 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
> Washington, DC 20006 USA
> +1 202 663 6695 (t)
> +1 202 663 6363 (f)
> becky.burr at wilmerhale.com
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster at wilmerhale.com <mailto:postmaster at wilmerhale.com> —and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
>
> For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://www.wilmerhale.com <http://www.wilmerhale.com/>  <http://www.wilmerhale.com/> .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposed Working Group Structure.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 30208 bytes
Desc: Proposed Working Group Structure.doc
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100620/890f28cd/attachment.doc 


More information about the AT-Review mailing list