[AT-Review] Questions for community

Cheryl Langdon-Orr langdonorr at gmail.com
Fri May 7 17:30:28 UTC 2010

Quick response from San Fransisco INET Meeting  see Twitter #SFBayISOC
 forgive the brevity, (most uncharacteristic for me)  see inter-spaced

Cheryl Langdon-Orr

On 8 May 2010 02:59, <wcurrie at gn.apc.org> wrote:

> Dear Cheryl and Olivier
> I've drafted a basic set of questions based on paragraph 9.1. which also
> pick up on Fabio's point of whether there is a problem with ICANN's
> accountability and transparency.I haven't included anything from
> paragraphs 7 and 8 as yet.

<CLO>  Thank you Willie this is a great start and after today (event into
the evening)  I will also become more  contributory and will make additions
ref 7&8 (the latter being limited as was discussed in our full team meeting

> What I'm wondering is whether we should get these questions out quickly by
> 15 May and then work on the survey dimesion when we have more time to
> devote to it, given that we are all travlling and are also having to get
> back to our regular work in the next week?

<CLO>  Yes  excellent plan :-)   Noting  of course that I'll loose a day
going home so leave Sunday night and arrive Tue morning after some (minor)
recovery time that day, I'll be ready  but I do have a half day Thur morning
out of office at another collaborations tools event by Cisco (might be of
some use ;-)

> What do you think?
<CLO>  See above  for generalities but YES we should aim for some sort of
push out around May 15th and hopefully even some survey matters might make
the timeline in a perfect world ;-)

> Best
> Willie
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100508/ff0a161d/attachment.html 

More information about the AT-Review mailing list