[AT-Review] (no subject)

[Marco Lorenzoni]

Dear Review Team members,
I would like to share some opinions with you on a few key elements of the methodology of the Accountability and Transparency review, and this from a specific perspective. As some of you know, I have resigned from ICANN and will return to practice as an independent evaluation consultant in June –  a profession that I practiced for about ten years before joining ICANN less than two years ago. 

So, my perspective is one of both a professional evaluator, and of one who has served ICANN as Director for Organizational Reviews. Of course, I will not be further involved in the Accountability and Transparency review process. In other words, even if neutrality in absolute terms cannot exist within the ICANN multi-stakeholder governance model, please consider these comments as coming from an informed but mostly neutral position.

Please, find my opinions in the attached file; with my most sincere wishes of success for your challenging exercise


Marco Lorenzoni
---------------------
ICANN
Director, Organizational Review
marco.lorenzoni at icann.org
Phone: +32.2.234 78 69
Mobile: +32.475.72 47 47
Fax: +32 2 234 7848
Skype: marco_lorenzoni
---------------------
6, Rond Point Schuman
B-1040 Brussels, Belgium
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: On RT methodology.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 62976 bytes
Desc: On RT methodology.doc
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100524/2c17ad92/attachment.doc