[AT-Review] Draft work schedule

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Happy with the plan you outline Brian and YES to a standard every other week
for call option with a +8 hrs shift forward on the clock as discussed in MdR
...

I copied Alice so staff support knows what is happening and as
Gisella schedules the myriad of GNSO and ALAC WG and meeting or briefing
calls she needs to know possible time slots  that we will be 'blocking out'
 as it is tomorrows call is clashing with the 2nd of the now 2 x a week call
for the Vertical Integration WG that some of us are involved in... NP for a
once off but to be avoided as a regular issue IMO

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 27 May 2010 14:01, Brian Cute <briancute at afilias.info> wrote:

>  RT,
>
>
>
> Attached is a proposed work schedule for discussion on tomorrow’s call.
> The proposed schedule is primarily focused on the Management Assessment and
> review of case studies from the ICANN Community and ICANN.  If the
> Management Assessment is to conclude before our September meeting, that
> would create a very compressed timeframe for the assessor.  The proposed
> work schedule would extend the Management Assessment work until the end of
> October and call for a mid-term report from the assessor.  It would also
> create a parallel track for review based on feedback (hopefully a case study
> or two) from the ICANN community and ICANN coming out of the Brussels
> meetings.  Let’s try to establish a work schedule during tomorrow’s call.
> We should also establish a regular RT call schedule (every other week?) to
> avoid delay and difficulty of doing repeating Doodle polls.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> AT-Review mailing list
> AT-Review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100527/90f1c0d3/attachment.html