[AT-Review] Meetings in Cartagena

Larry Strickling Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov
Mon Nov 15 23:43:15 UTC 2010


I agree with Chris.

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 6:25 PM
To: at-review at icann.org
Cc: olof.nordling at icann.org; alice.jansen at icann.org
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Meetings in Cartagena

All,

This is in danger of getting out of hand.

If we meet with every SO or AC separately there's not a lot of point in having a main session on Monday. The Monday main sessions are intended to be for everyone to attend which is why generally SO and AC meetings don't clash with the Monday main session meetings.

On the other hand, as Brian has correctly identified, if we start meeting separately with SOs and ACs we have to be available to meet with them all.

All of this after the comment period on the report has closed.

I can see a special case for meeting one on one with the GAC because, like the Board, they are the subject of specific recommendations re the Board/GAC relationship.

I'm unclear why other SOs and ACs cannot simply attend the Monday session.

Cheers,

Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer
.au Domain Administration Ltd
T: 1300 732 929<tel:1300%20732%20929> | F: 03 8341 4112<tel:03%208341%204112>
E: ceo at auda.org.au<mailto:ceo at auda.org.au> | W:www.auda.org.au<http://www.auda.org.au/>

auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator


Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Cheryl Langdon-Orr
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2010 10:08
To: olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com
Cc: alice.jansen at icann.org; olof.nordling at icann.org; at-review at icann.org
Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Meetings in Cartagena

Adam / NomCom  could fit onto a group AC/SO meeting as well I suppose  but  again any scheduled time with him will need to be micro managed into already tight schedules... and early in the week when werer all still there...

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)

On 16 November 2010 09:06, <olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com<mailto:olivier.muron at orange-ftgroup.com>> wrote:
RT,

I met Adam Peake in Paris at the end of last week.
As you know, he will chair the NomCom next year.

If feasible, he would also like to meet us in Cartagena.

Regards,
Olivier

________________________________
De : at-review-bounces at icann.org<mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org<mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org>] De la part de Brian Cute
Envoyé : lundi 15 novembre 2010 20:09
À : at-review at icann.org<mailto:at-review at icann.org>
Cc : 'Olof Nordling'; 'Alice Jansen'
Objet : [AT-Review] Meetings in Cartagena
RT,

Diane Schroeder has confirmed the ATRT meeting with the ICANN Board on Sunday, December 5, 2010 at 4:00p.m. to 5:30p.m.  The meeting with the public is scheduled for Monday from 2:00p.m. to 3:30p.m.

I have been asked by Heather Dryden of the GAC and by the GNSO for face-to-face meetings.  I had discussed with Heather and Chuck Gomes that our intention was to meet with the Board and the public only in Cartagena and not meet with all the ACs and SOs as we did in Brussels.  However, if the organizations feel it is important to meet, my view is that the ATRT should attempt to accommodate these requests conscious of two facts:  1) if the ATRT meets with one or two ACs/SOs, there may be a negative perception from ACs/SOs that the ATRT does not meet with; and 2) it may be difficult to schedule all members of the RT to attend every scheduled meeting.

I propose the following:  I will send an email to the Chairs of each AC/SO indicating that the ATRT intends to have a meeting with the Board and the public in Cartagena.  I will note that the ATRT has been asked for a meeting by the GNSO and the GAC and will give each Chair the opportunity to request a meeting if their group wishes to do so.  With respect to scheduling meetings and attendance by ATRT members, I recognize we may not have the entire RT at each meeting.  I have spoken with Manal and she and I will commit to making scheduled meetings (at least one of us).

Regards,
Brian

_______________________________________________
AT-Review mailing list
AT-Review at icann.org<mailto:AT-Review at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5622 (20101115) __________


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.


http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5622 (20101115) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101115/acd28185/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the AT-Review mailing list