[AT-Review] WG4

[Brian Cute]

Chris,

 

Thanks for the contribution.  I may have in fact I misconstrued Larry's
comments in the draft.  Larry, does Chris' attached version square with your
suggestions?  If not, please indicate any different view you have so we can
settle this portion of the document.  RT members, if you have comments with
respect to Chris' draft please weigh in now.

 

Regards,

Brian

 

From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo at auda.org.au] 
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 7:50 PM
To: briancute at afilias.info; at-review at icann.org;
ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; 'Caroline Nolan';
rfaris at cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [AT-Review] WG4
Importance: High

 

Brian,

 

I think you have gone too far with the suggested changes based on my
understanding of Larry's comments.

 

Attached is a document setting out the WG4 recommendations from ATRT Draft
Master 5.0 with Larry's comments (or at least my interpretation of them)
added AND below in the same document what the recommendations would look
like if we action Larry's comments. 

 

I would be happy to proceed with these recommendations. 

 

I have not addressed Larry's comments on language in the Findings section of
WG4 but, in the main, agree with him. 

 

Cheers, 

 

Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer

.au Domain Administration Ltd

 <tel:1300%20732%20929> T: 1300 732 929 |  <tel:03%208341%204112> F: 03 8341
4112

E: ceo at auda.org.au | W: <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au

 

auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator

 

 

Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential
and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Cute
Sent: Friday, 22 October 2010 04:03
To: at-review at icann.org; ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; 'Caroline Nolan';
rfaris at cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: [AT-Review] WG4

 

RT

 

Attached is a revised WG4 section taking into account Larry's remarks.
Please review and suggest any edit so we can lock this down.  I continue to
check the footnotes, citations and source references.

 

Regards,

Brian



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5553 (20101021) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5553 (20101021) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101021/6ddb6f9e/attachment.html