[AT-Review] New draft WG4 for ATRT call
Brian Cute
briancute at afilias.info
Mon Oct 25 17:11:19 UTC 2010
Manal,
Thank you for reviewing the document and making these edits. I believe
(hope) that I captured all of them in the final draft.
Best,
Brian
From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:18 AM
To: briancute at afilias.info; at-review at icann.org;
ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; Caroline Nolan; rfaris at cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [AT-Review] New draft WG4 for ATRT call
Dear Brian ..
With respect to WG4 report, there are 2 minor typos on page 5 of the
attached version (which was the last version you circulated but does not
reflect the cc discussions), those are:
" Midterm Review of the review of the Joint Project Agreement (JPA) "
" Recommendation 2.8: Establish and additional mechanism for the community "
Also regarding the draft master that was already sent to the translation
(I'm not sure if it's too late but I believe it won't harm even for the
final version), I have revised the document, checking for any typos,
unfortunately only pages 25 thu 38, starting WG2 report ..
Please find attached with typos marked in track changes ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
From: at-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:at-review-bounces at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Cute
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:43 PM
To: at-review at icann.org; ugasser at cyber.law.harvard.edu; 'Caroline Nolan';
rfaris at cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: [AT-Review] New draft WG4 for ATRT call
RT,
Attached is an updated version of WG4 for our call. It includes:
- The WG4 section of the Executive Summary with the Recommendation
language proposed by Manal;
- The WG4 Findings section with edits proposed by Warren and edits
I proposed (which Olivier endorsed in his email today)
- The WG4 Recommendation language proposed by Manal.
Regards,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20101025/61899dcf/attachment.html
More information about the AT-Review
mailing list