[AT-Review] Ahead of our conference call

Fabio Colasanti fabio at colasanti.it
Sun Sep 5 22:49:43 UTC 2010


Dear all,

either I have missed a number of e-mails or some of the WG summaries are still on their way.

I have seen a complete document for WG2 (Larry and Manal) and a document covering a part of the remit of WG1, but missing the parts "Questions for review" and "Would Icann's A&T be improved by?" (Chris).   I have not seen anything from groups 3 and 4.

All the best;

Fabio


> ==========================
> Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:21:38 +0200
> From: "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg>
> To: "Fabio Colasanti" <fabio at colasanti.it>,         "Larry Strickling" 
> <Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov>, <at-review at icann.org>
> Cc: <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>, <guofeng at catr.cn>
> Subject: RE: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> ==========================
> 
> Dear Colleagues ..
> 
> It seems that I have edited in a version that was not the latest, 
> sincere apologies ..
> I'm attaching again the version of the document that Larry sent 
> to the list yesterday and have included in it my additions along 
> with Fabio's below suggestion ..
> For ease of reference, kindly note that no changes took place 
> to the original text sent by Larry and that all additions are 
> marked in track changes ..
> Apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused ..
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> --Manal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Colasanti [mailto:fabio at colasanti.it]
> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 7:48 AM
> To: Manal Ismail; Larry Strickling; at-review at icann.org
> Cc: FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov; guofeng at catr.cn
> Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> 
> 
> I repeat my suggestion to add the following bullet point:
> 
> - by creating a database listing the advice received from GAC 
> and the follow-up it has received?
> 
> Fabio
> 
> > ==========================
> > Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 02:58:20 +0200
> > From: "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg>
> > To: "Larry Strickling" <Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov>, <at-review at icann.org>
> > Cc: Fiona Alexander <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>, guofeng at catr.cn
> > Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> > ==========================
> >
> > Dear Larry ..
> > Many thanks for the draft ..
> > I've tried, to my best, to fulfill the missing information 
> ..
> > I still intend to go through the document again before our 
> call
> > but decided to send this version for the sake of time, apologies
> > for the delay ..
> > Hope I have not misunderstood any of the place holders ..
> > Meanwhile, I believe we should also reference the GAC Operating
> > Principles ..
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > --Manal
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > ãä: at-review-bounces at icann.org ÈÇáäíÇÈÉ Úä Larry Strickling
> > ÊÇÑíÎ ÇáÅÑÓÇá: ÇáÌãÚÉ 03/09/2010 11:38 ã
> > Åáì: at-review at icann.org
> > äÓÎÉ: Fiona Alexander; guofeng at catr.cn
> > ÇáãæÖæÚ: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is a rough draft of the summary for Working Group 2.  
> There
> > are a number of factual holes that I am hoping Manal will be
> > able to fill at the appropriate time.  I did not follow Chris'
> > template to the letter, partly because the review questions 
> I
> > have set forth are all on matters on which, in my view, it 
> is
> > appropriate for the ATRT to comment as part of our review. 
>  We
> > can discuss on Monday.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian, if Berkman is not already on the AT-Review mailing list,
> > could you forward this document to them?
> >
> >
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> Allegato "<A HREF="/cgi-bin/visp/main.pl/WG%202%20-%20redline%20MI.doc?SK=sk128366174051358&r=4c82ecf9.0.x13cae&arg=att1.2">WG 
> 2 - redline MI.doc</A>" (application/msword)<BR>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AT-Review mailing list
> > AT-Review at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
> 
> 
> 
Allegato "<A HREF="/cgi-bin/visp/main.pl/Working%20Group%202%20Summary%20Sept%205%202010.doc?SK=sk128372502867857&r=4c838ce9.0.x230e7&arg=att1.2">Working Group 2 Summary Sept 5 2010.doc</A>" (application/msword)<BR>




More information about the AT-Review mailing list