[AT-Review] Ahead of our conference call
Brian Cute
briancute at afilias.info
Mon Sep 6 02:53:19 UTC 2010
This was sent to the list yesterday afternoon.
Regards,
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: Fabio Colasanti [mailto:fabio at colasanti.it]
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 6:50 PM
To: Manal Ismail; Larry Strickling; at-review at icann.org
Cc: FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov; Alice Jansen; guofeng at catr.cn
Subject: [AT-Review] Ahead of our conference call
Dear all,
either I have missed a number of e-mails or some of the WG summaries are
still on their way.
I have seen a complete document for WG2 (Larry and Manal) and a document
covering a part of the remit of WG1, but missing the parts "Questions for
review" and "Would Icann's A&T be improved by?" (Chris). I have not seen
anything from groups 3 and 4.
All the best;
Fabio
> ==========================
> Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:21:38 +0200
> From: "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg>
> To: "Fabio Colasanti" <fabio at colasanti.it>, "Larry Strickling"
> <Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov>, <at-review at icann.org>
> Cc: <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>, <guofeng at catr.cn>
> Subject: RE: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> ==========================
>
> Dear Colleagues ..
>
> It seems that I have edited in a version that was not the latest,
> sincere apologies ..
> I'm attaching again the version of the document that Larry sent
> to the list yesterday and have included in it my additions along
> with Fabio's below suggestion ..
> For ease of reference, kindly note that no changes took place
> to the original text sent by Larry and that all additions are
> marked in track changes ..
> Apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused ..
>
> Kind regards
>
> --Manal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Colasanti [mailto:fabio at colasanti.it]
> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 7:48 AM
> To: Manal Ismail; Larry Strickling; at-review at icann.org
> Cc: FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov; guofeng at catr.cn
> Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
>
>
> I repeat my suggestion to add the following bullet point:
>
> - by creating a database listing the advice received from GAC
> and the follow-up it has received?
>
> Fabio
>
> > ==========================
> > Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 02:58:20 +0200
> > From: "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg>
> > To: "Larry Strickling" <Lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov>, <at-review at icann.org>
> > Cc: Fiona Alexander <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>, guofeng at catr.cn
> > Subject: Re: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> > ==========================
> >
> > Dear Larry ..
> > Many thanks for the draft ..
> > I've tried, to my best, to fulfill the missing information
> ..
> > I still intend to go through the document again before our
> call
> > but decided to send this version for the sake of time, apologies
> > for the delay ..
> > Hope I have not misunderstood any of the place holders ..
> > Meanwhile, I believe we should also reference the GAC Operating
> > Principles ..
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > --Manal
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > ãä: at-review-bounces at icann.org ÈÇáäíÇÈÉ Úä Larry Strickling
> > ÊÇÑíÎ ÇáÅÑÓÇá: ÇáÌãÚÉ 03/09/2010 11:38 ã
> > Åáì: at-review at icann.org
> > äÓÎÉ: Fiona Alexander; guofeng at catr.cn
> > ÇáãæÖæÚ: [AT-Review] Working Group 2 Summary
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is a rough draft of the summary for Working Group 2.
> There
> > are a number of factual holes that I am hoping Manal will be
> > able to fill at the appropriate time. I did not follow Chris'
> > template to the letter, partly because the review questions
> I
> > have set forth are all on matters on which, in my view, it
> is
> > appropriate for the ATRT to comment as part of our review.
> We
> > can discuss on Monday.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian, if Berkman is not already on the AT-Review mailing list,
> > could you forward this document to them?
> >
> >
> >
> > Larry
> >
> >
> Allegato "<A
HREF="/cgi-bin/visp/main.pl/WG%202%20-%20redline%20MI.doc?SK=sk1283661740513
58&r=4c82ecf9.0.x13cae&arg=att1.2">WG
> 2 - redline MI.doc</A>" (application/msword)<BR>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AT-Review mailing list
> > AT-Review at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
>
>
>
Allegato "<A
HREF="/cgi-bin/visp/main.pl/Working%20Group%202%20Summary%20Sept%205%202010.
doc?SK=sk128372502867857&r=4c838ce9.0.x230e7&arg=att1.2">Working Group 2
Summary Sept 5 2010.doc</A>" (application/msword)<BR>
_______________________________________________
AT-Review mailing list
AT-Review at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-review
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WG4 template2 0.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 36864 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/at-review/attachments/20100905/101d8440/attachment-0001.doc
More information about the AT-Review
mailing list