[atrt2] Egalitarian listing of ATRT2 members?

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Feb 23 19:56:29 UTC 2013

I agree that there need no explicit separation. When/if we publish 
lists, it would be good to mention the lineage, much as we typically 
put (Chair) after a name. But no need to differentiate while we are working.


At 23/02/2013 02:16 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
>During the organization call Friday I was using a print out of the 
>members.  It had separate sections for the Volunteer Review Team 
>members, the Independent Experts and the Ex-Officios.  My preference 
>is for all of the team members to be considered uniformly part of 
>the same team, leaving behind the history of how we were 
>selected.  However, if the team prefers to retain the distinctions, 
>it's certainly workable.
>This is a small point, but since I found myself reacting 
>internally  and, to some extent, tripping over it while I chaired 
>the call, I thought I'd mention it.
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org

More information about the atrt2 mailing list