[atrt2] Egalitarian listing of ATRT2 members?
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Feb 23 19:56:29 UTC 2013
I agree that there need no explicit separation. When/if we publish
lists, it would be good to mention the lineage, much as we typically
put (Chair) after a name. But no need to differentiate while we are working.
At 23/02/2013 02:16 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
>During the organization call Friday I was using a print out of the
>members. It had separate sections for the Volunteer Review Team
>members, the Independent Experts and the Ex-Officios. My preference
>is for all of the team members to be considered uniformly part of
>the same team, leaving behind the history of how we were
>selected. However, if the team prefers to retain the distinctions,
>it's certainly workable.
>This is a small point, but since I found myself reacting
>internally and, to some extent, tripping over it while I chaired
>the call, I thought I'd mention it.
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
More information about the atrt2