[atrt2] Meeting in Beijing

[David Conrad]

Perhaps I might suggest a doodle poll so we can resolve this sooner rather than later?

Regards,
-drc

On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> I guess one cannot proof-read something too many times. Yes, the dates before the meeting are 5 and 6.
> 
> So the options I listed should be:
> 
> a) 5, 6 (Before)
> b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
> c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
> d) 6, 12 (Split with no break)
> e) 6, 13 (Split with a break)
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 23/02/2013 03:30 AM, Lise Fuhr wrote:
> 
>> It seems that the dates that Alan has suggested are bit wrong. Saturday is the 6 April and if that is what is meant by d) this is perfect for me. I agree we should meet in Beijing.
>> Best
>> Lise
>> 
>> 
>> Den 23/02/2013 kl. 00.36 skrev David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>:
>> 
>> > I agree with Avri both in that I can live with any of the options but see some advantage in (d).
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > -drc
>> >
>> > On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for starting the conversation.
>> >>
>> >> I agree with the reasoning and can live with any of the options.
>> >> My preference is for (d).
>> >>
>> >> I like the idea of getting a day in before, i.e. bracketing the ICANN meeting with our meeting.
>> >>
>> >> avri
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 22 Feb 2013, at 18:18, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> To kick off the discussion, Since a large number of our group will be
>> >>> in Beijing, I don't think that we can afford not to meet there. We
>> >>> are starting far later than originally planned, but still trying to
>> >>> make the original deadline of 31-Dec. I think a 2nd face-to-face
>> >>> meeting near the start of our work is valuable, so it is either
>> >>> Beijing, or moving the entire group to somewhere else very close (in
>> >>> time) to the Beijing meeting.
>> >>>
>> >>> If we are looking for two days (which seems reasonable to me), there
>> >>> seem to be several potential options from the two days preceding the
>> >>> start of many meetings (Fri Apr 4, Sat Apr 5) and the three days
>> >>> after (Fri Apr 12, Sat Apr 13, Sun Apr 14). Note that some of us are
>> >>> scheduled for other meetings on Sat, Apr 5 (I am), but probably not
>> >>> enough to rule out that day.
>> >>>
>> >>> If we were to meet only after the ICANN week, my inclination would be
>> >>> to make it Sat-Sun to give people just a bit of time to clear their
>> >>> minds and get ready.
>> >>>
>> >>> So the options seems to be:
>> >>>
>> >>> a) 4, 5 (Before)
>> >>> b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
>> >>> c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
>> >>> d) 5, 12 (Split with no break)
>> >>> e) 5, 13 (Split with a break)
>> >>>
>> >>> I can live with any of these options but have a preference for a or c.
>> >>>
>> >>> Alan
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> atrt2 mailing list
>> >>> atrt2 at icann.org
>> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> atrt2 mailing list
>> >> atrt2 at icann.org
>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > atrt2 mailing list
>> > atrt2 at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrt2 mailing list
>> atrt2 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>