[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment

[Brian Cute]

Avri,

I added your question re: the PDP.  Upon further review, the question on
Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is
drafted as a "catch all."  I revised it to add the word "questions" that
the ATRT2 should be reviewing.  Does that sufficiently capture the
question your were trying to pose?

Carlos,

I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community."  Is
that consistent with your intent?

I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions
published.  Please respond rapidly.

Regards,
Brian

On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:

>
>On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
>
>> Avri,
>> 
>> Leaving out the last question was an oversight.
>> I can insert it in the
>> final version.  
>
>Thanks
>
>> Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
>> satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
>
>Does the following (or some variant) work?
>
>What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions
>of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities.
>Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its activities?
>Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its
>decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development
>Processes?  Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the
>ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or
>replace existing policy without Community development process or
>consultation?  Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should
>explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy
>Development Process?
>
>Thanks
>
>avri
>
>
>>  Thanks.
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> hi,
>>> 
>>> I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>>> the archive.
>>> 
>>> Re 9.1 (e)
>>> 
>>> "
>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>>> ICANn Policy Development Process?
>>> "
>>> "
>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its decision-making?
>>> "
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v4.docx
Type: application/x-msword
Size: 34867 bytes
Desc: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v4.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20130330/5d32091b/StructuringPublicCommentQuestions-v4.docx>