[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment
bcute at pir.org
Sat Mar 30 14:07:44 UTC 2013
Latest version of the document including Avri's question.
Last question for you Carlos, regarding the suggested edit to question #
10 that appears in v.4. Please let me know if that is consistent with
your intent. Thank you.
On 3/30/13 9:00 AM, "Brian Cute" <bcute at pir.org> wrote:
>I added your question re: the PDP. Upon further review, the question on
>Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is
>drafted as a "catch all." I revised it to add the word "questions" that
>the ATRT2 should be reviewing. Does that sufficiently capture the
>question your were trying to pose?
>I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community." Is
>that consistent with your intent?
>I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions
>published. Please respond rapidly.
>On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>>On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
>>> Leaving out the last question was an oversight.
>>> I can insert it in the
>>> final version.
>>> Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
>>> satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
>>Does the following (or some variant) work?
>>What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions
>>of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities.
>>Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its
>>Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its
>>decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development
>>Processes? Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the
>>ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or
>>replace existing policy without Community development process or
>>consultation? Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should
>>explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy
>>> On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>> I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>>>> the archive.
>>>> Re 9.1 (e)
>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>>>> ICANn Policy Development Process?
>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its
>>atrt2 mailing list
>>atrt2 at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5.docx
Size: 34818 bytes
Desc: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5.docx
More information about the atrt2