[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment

[Brian Cute]

Latest version of the document including Avri's question.

Last question for you Carlos, regarding the suggested edit to question #
10 that appears in v.4.  Please let me know if that is consistent with
your intent.  Thank you.

Regards,
Brian

On 3/30/13 9:00 AM, "Brian Cute" <bcute at pir.org> wrote:

>Avri,
>
>I added your question re: the PDP.  Upon further review, the question on
>Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is
>drafted as a "catch all."  I revised it to add the word "questions" that
>the ATRT2 should be reviewing.  Does that sufficiently capture the
>question your were trying to pose?
>
>Carlos,
>
>I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community."  Is
>that consistent with your intent?
>
>I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions
>published.  Please respond rapidly.
>
>Regards,
>Brian
>
>On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
>>
>>> Avri,
>>> 
>>> Leaving out the last question was an oversight.
>>> I can insert it in the
>>> final version. 
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>> Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
>>> satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
>>
>>Does the following (or some variant) work?
>>
>>What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions
>>of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities.
>>Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its
>>activities?
>>Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its
>>decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development
>>Processes?  Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the
>>ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or
>>replace existing policy without Community development process or
>>consultation?  Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should
>>explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy
>>Development Process?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>avri
>>
>>
>>>  Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>>>> the archive.
>>>> 
>>>> Re 9.1 (e)
>>>> 
>>>> "
>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>>>> ICANn Policy Development Process?
>>>> "
>>>> "
>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its
>>>>decision-making?
>>>> "
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>atrt2 mailing list
>>atrt2 at icann.org
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5.docx
Type: application/x-msword
Size: 34818 bytes
Desc: Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20130330/03015100/StructuringPublicCommentQuestions-v5.docx>