[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Looks good.  Thanks for adding the 1-10 scale.  And the metrics at the end is a good addition.

In addition to having this released as a document people can respond to with another document, is it worth turning it into a form on line as well.

thanks

avri


On 30 Mar 2013, at 18:38, David Conrad wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Apologies for not providing these comments/edits earlier (just back from travel). The executive summary of the edits:
> 
> - tried to make the questions more quantitative by asking for a response along a scale (1 to 10).  As mentioned on the call, I do not think a binary yes/no for most of the questions provides particularly useful information since I suspect most folks will want to answer "sometimes yes, sometimes no".
> - asked for more suggestions of metrics
> - various consistency and consolidation edits trying to make the questions more readable (at least for me).
> 
> With respect to the comments, I found a number of places in which I was confused about what was being referenced.  Perhaps that's just me, however.
> 
> FWIW, use as you see fit.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 
> <Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5-drc.docx>
> 
> On Mar 30, 2013, at 7:07 AM, Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org> wrote:
> 
>> Latest version of the document including Avri's question.
>> 
>> Last question for you Carlos, regarding the suggested edit to question #
>> 10 that appears in v.4.  Please let me know if that is consistent with
>> your intent.  Thank you.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>> 
>> On 3/30/13 9:00 AM, "Brian Cute" <bcute at pir.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Avri,
>>> 
>>> I added your question re: the PDP.  Upon further review, the question on
>>> Improving Accountability and Transparency near the end of the document is
>>> drafted as a "catch all."  I revised it to add the word "questions" that
>>> the ATRT2 should be reviewing.  Does that sufficiently capture the
>>> question your were trying to pose?
>>> 
>>> Carlos,
>>> 
>>> I edited question #10 to read "ICANN" instead of "ICANN community."  Is
>>> that consistent with your intent?
>>> 
>>> I would like this to be the last revision so we can get the questions
>>> published.  Please respond rapidly.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> On 3/30/13 8:04 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:20, Brian Cute wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Avri,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Leaving out the last question was an oversight.
>>>>> I can insert it in the
>>>>> final version. 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>>> Is the edit to your question re: Staff and the PDP
>>>>> satisfactory or do you have a proposed construction?
>>>> 
>>>> Does the following (or some variant) work?
>>>> 
>>>> What is your assessment of ICANN Staff adherence to the policy decisions
>>>> of the ICANN Policy Development Process in its operational activities.
>>>> Has ICANN Staff been accountable to the ICANN community in its
>>>> activities?
>>>> Can you give examples of where ICANN Staff has restricted its
>>>> decision-making to the boundaries set by the Policy Development
>>>> Processes?  Can you give examples where ICANN Staff has gone beyond the
>>>> ICANN Community Policy Development Process to either make new policy or
>>>> replace existing policy without Community development process or
>>>> consultation?  Are there specific accountability issues the ATRT2 should
>>>> explore related to ICANN Staff's interactions with the Community Policy
>>>> Development Process?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> avri
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Brian
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/29/13 10:40 PM, "Avril Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was not able to open what I received, but I was able to pull it from
>>>>>> the archive.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Re 9.1 (e)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "
>>>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been bound its decision-making by the
>>>>>> ICANn Policy Development Process?
>>>>>> "
>>>>>> "
>>>>>> To what extent has ICANN Staff been accountable in its
>>>>>> decision-making?
>>>>>> "
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> atrt2 mailing list
>>>> atrt2 at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>>> 
>> 
>> <Structuring Public Comment Questions - v5.docx>_______________________________________________
>> atrt2 mailing list
>> atrt2 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2