[atrt2] Questions for Public Comment

Carlos Raúl G. crg at isoc-cr.org
Mon Apr 1 14:14:09 UTC 2013

Sorry, I was traveling. Wording of 10/11 much better. Just two small comments:
1/ I think the ranking from unacceptable to excellent is better than the first one.
2/ I don't know how to spell it out, but even the Supreme Court allows for minority positions to remain on record. Shouldn't this be possible for the PDP process as well? Don't know if it fits better under 10 or 11.

Greetings from Montevideo. 

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

SUTEL, Costa Rica

+506 4000 0010 Oficina
+506 8335 2487 Móvil 
+506 2215 6821 Fax

El 31/03/2013, a las 23:22, Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org> escribió:

> Carlos,
> Please see David Conrad's questions concerning Q.10 and Q.11, and my prior question concerning Q.10.  With the exception of your clarifications in response to David's question and my question, the document is ready to go to ICANN staff for publication.  Please respond ASAP.  Thank you.
> Regards,
> Brian
> P.S.  David, thank you for the useful edits.
> <Structuring Public Comment Questions - v6.docx>

More information about the atrt2 mailing list