[bc-gnso] IRT Final report

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 3 15:10:13 UTC 2009





I'd like to urge that we move ahead with implementing the parts of the CSG approach that would move administrative functions into centralized and ICANN staff supported support mechanism. Even if the 'seating' of the Policy Council is delayed, there are other pending recommendations that are about the administration/management functions that can move ahead. I'd like to have those remain on the discussion and priority list for change.  

As a small business OR a large business, what is important is that one meets the criteria for membership, and that there is complete neutrality in the application of membership criteria. I am not aware that any member is required to post their details to all other members. 
:-) 
However if this was just an indirect way [this is a joke] to propose a new BC 'social network' for getting acquainted with each other, sorry, I have too much work to do responding to all of ICANN's public comment processes!  


> From: philip.sheppard at aim.be
> To: bc-gnso at icann.org
> Subject: [bc-gnso] IRT Final report
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:31:56 +0200
> 
> 
> 
> George, 
> I imply nothing.
> Its just that I know nothing about your company, its business objectives, global
> reach and staffing.
> 
> Philip pp AIM
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20090603/940cd7c8/attachment.html>


More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list