[bc-gnso] Draft GNSO Council letter to the GAC

Marilyn Cade marilynscade at hotmail.com
Thu May 14 17:50:38 UTC 2009

I would support an abstention. First, positions like this deserve broader BC discussion, and as noted by Philip, there are items where there may not be membership consensus. 

Marilyn Cade
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard at aim.be>

Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:20:36 
To: <bc-gnso at icann.org>
Subject: [bc-gnso] Draft GNSO Council letter to the GAC

 Driven by the Registrars, the Council is considering a letter to the GAC (draft attached) in
 response to the GAC letter to ICANN CEO.
 http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karklins-to-twomey-24apr09.pdf <http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karklins-to-twomey-24apr09.pdf> 
 The Council response raises issues with which the BC may agree and others with which we may
 We have therefore indicated at this stage a BC abstention.
 The IPC has done the same.
 Do let me know if you have any views.

More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list