[bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
Marilyn Cade
marilynscade at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 21 23:38:14 UTC 2009
I need a bit more clarification. Since this requires a vote of the BC [CBUC] are we first asked for edits and comments, and then a vote, or are we actually voting on this version?
I know we are trying to learn new rules, but it would be helpful to get that clarification.
I really appreciate that you are doing this work, Berry.
Will you be joining us in Seoul? It would be good to get acquainted!
Marilyn
From: berrycobb at infinityportals.com
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:44:42 -0700
CBUC,
My mistake, PEDNR is a formal
PDP, and not a Pre-PDP as I indicated below. My apologies for any confusion.
Berry A. Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891
From: Berry Cobb
[mailto:berrycobb at infinityportals.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 10:16
To: 'bc-gnso at icann.org'
Subject: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
CBUC,
Attached is the DRAFT Position Statement for CBUC relative
to the Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group. (PEDNR-WG).
All comments and suggestions are welcome. With the PEDNR being a Pre-PDP,
it is my understanding a formal vote by the CBUC will not occur on this
position statement. Rather, it will be reserved for a final CBUC Position
statement based on PEDNR outcomes and recommendations.
Please advise if you have questions or comments.
I will be sure to incorporate all comments and changes to this statement.
It is my desire to have this statement returned to the PEDNR
– WG by COB 11/6/2009.
Thank you.
Berry A. Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20091021/9eb460e5/attachment.html>
More information about the Bc-gnso
mailing list