[bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group

Berry Cobb berrycobb at infinityportals.com
Tue Oct 27 21:21:26 UTC 2009



I was not able to remotely attend the CBUC session yesterday due to
conference line issues.  However, I will be sure to catch the recorded


It was my intent to quickly ask for clarification around the BC Position
Statement for PEDNR.  I understood from our last BC conference call that a
vote was NOT required on this, regardless of my misstatement below.  Either
way, I submitted a draft of the statement to the BC List on 10/20 for
comments and edits, and to date, Marilyn's comments below are all that has
been received.


May I ask for assistance with a few questions below, please?


1.        Are we, in fact, dealing with "new rules" as stated below?  Either
way, can I get a pointer to where the Constituency Position Statement
process is located?  I'm sure it probably exists on the ICANN site
somewhere, but I cannot seem to find it. 

2.       Do we need a VOTE on initial position statements like this (Pre-PDP
or PDP)?  And if so, when and by what platform is that accomplished?  Is
this process initiated by request to the BC Secretariat?

3.       The 11/6 deadline date...what happens if I receive zero feedback?
I do understand we are in the middle of Seoul, but I would like to remind
everyone that this position statement is beyond the PEDNR working group's


Thank you for the assistance and my apologies for not being in Seoul.  Enjoy
the remainder of the sessions.



Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC


From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 16:38
To: berrycobb at infinityportals.com; bc - GNSO list
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group


I need a bit more clarification. Since this requires a vote of the BC [CBUC]
are we first asked for edits and comments, and then a vote, or are we
actually voting on this version?


I know we are trying to learn new rules, but it would be helpful to get that


I really appreciate that you are doing this work, Berry. 


Will you be joining us in Seoul? It would be good to get acquainted! 




From: berrycobb at infinityportals.com
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:44:42 -0700



My mistake, PEDNR is a formal PDP, and not a Pre-PDP as I indicated below.
My apologies for any confusion.



Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC


From: Berry Cobb [mailto:berrycobb at infinityportals.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 10:16
To: 'bc-gnso at icann.org'
Subject: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group




Attached is the DRAFT Position Statement for CBUC relative to the Post
Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group. (PEDNR-WG).  All comments and
suggestions are welcome.  With the PEDNR being a Pre-PDP, it is my
understanding a formal vote by the CBUC will not occur on this position
statement.  Rather, it will be reserved for a final CBUC Position statement
based on PEDNR outcomes and recommendations.


Please advise if you have questions or comments.   I will be sure to
incorporate all comments and changes to this statement.  


It is my desire to have this statement returned to the PEDNR - WG by COB


Thank you.



Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20091027/d701e416/attachment.html>

More information about the Bc-gnso mailing list