[bc-gnso] PEDNAR (post expiration domain name recovery) PDP needs a constituency statement from us

[Michael D. Palage]

Mike R:

Procedurally I agree it is best not to have unilateral statements from
elected representatives or a small subset of the constituency without
properly vetting this issue within the constituency. I believe this is the
same point that George was articulating in connection with the funding of
Philip's travel request on behalf of the BC.

I personally believe that there are a number of important issues in this
working group that do impact businesses, and as a member of the working
group I will be trying to articulate them in the public session scheduled
for Seoul.  Therefore I believe labeling this issue a "low priority" is
dangerous as it might prejudice the advocacy of individual business
constituency members on this issue. Therefore I would respectfully submit
that a more accurate statement is that the BC constituency did not have time
to submit a response within the allotted public comment period, but will
continue to monitor the activities of the Working Group for its potential
impact on business users.

I am just concerned that your "low priority" statement as an elected BC
representative may be used out of context by some working groups members.

Hopefully you could agree with my friendly amended to your previous email
statement?

Michael P

P.S. Tough Chargers loss this past weekend, no miracle finish like last week
:-)



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:29 PM
To: 'Mike O'Connor'; 'BC gnso'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] PEDNAR (post expiration domain name recovery) PDP
needs a constituency statement from us


Thanks Mikey.  Comments are now past due.  I asked this same question a few
weeks ago and have not had any response from the small BC team or the
broader membership.  Accordingly, I consider this issue a low priority for
the BC.  Since nobody is volunteering to draft comments, the BC will not be
in position to provide any at this time.

-Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA  94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Mike O'Connor
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 5:25 AM
To: BC gnso
Subject: [bc-gnso] PEDNAR (post expiration domain name recovery) PDP needs a
constituency statement from us

hi gang,

i'm not paying a lot of attention to matters related to ICANN at the moment,
but i'm on the PEDNAR working group and constituency statements are due
soon.  i'm forwarding the one from the Registrar Constituency for you
information.  i can't draft one for us to review -- i'm completely buried
under another project for the next month.  does somebody want to take the
lead on getting this organized?

mikey