[bc-gnso] DAGv4 Public Comment Period ends in 8-days

[Deutsch, Sarah B]

I would support filing comments on the DAG 4 if there is enough time.
I'm happy to work with others on this to meet the deadline as we are in
the process of preparing our own comments.

Sarah
 


Sarah B. Deutsch 
Vice President & Associate General Counsel 
Verizon Communications 
Phone: 703-351-3044 
Fax: 703-351-3670 

 

________________________________

From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf
Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:50 AM
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] DAGv4 Public Comment Period ends in 8-days
Importance: High



Dear all,

 

I wanted to bring to the attention of the BC members that the DAGv4
Public Comment period is coming to a close Wednesday, in one week (July
21st).

 

We commented on four aspects in our post regarding DAGv3 (found here:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/3gtld-guide/msg00147.html ), to whit: 

 

*        ICANN Staff Recommendations for Rights Protection Mechanisms

 

*        Translations of Strings from ASCII to Other Scripts or
Languages 

 

*        Revised Comparative Evaluation Scoring 

 

*        Market Differentiation Between New gTLDs

 

While I do not know (and would like to hear from others that are better
informed) what happened with regard to our first issue, RPMs, I do know
that our other three comments were wholly ignored by staff.

 

I would submit to the members that we need to repost our comments with
some stronger language to ensure that staff hear and react to the BC's
concerns.  Whatever happens, we have one week to submit our comments.

 

Comments/thoughts?

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

 

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf
Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:09 AM
To: bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Policy question -- does the BC want to develop a
position on the current IRTP draft?

 

 

subject says it all.  IRTP-B is in public-comments.  does the BC have a
view?

 

mikey

 

 

- - - - - - - - -

phone             651-647-6109  

fax                   866-280-2356  

web     http://www.haven2.com

handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20100713/ea7ddb24/attachment.html>