[bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois Review Team - TWO changes

Tue Apr 12 18:27:17 UTC 2011

Sorry! here is document with changes. a couple are missing words.

From: marilynscade at hotmail.com
To: jocallaghan at newscorp.com; elisa.cooper at markmonitor.com; randruff at rnapartners.com; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com; sdelbianco at netchoice.org
CC: berrycobb at infinityportals.com; sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com; bc-gnso at icann.org
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois Review Team - TWO changes
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:35:57 -0400

I fixed a couple of typos. I also added in that the RT can review external data sources/reputable reports. I did not define 'reputable'.

From: JOCallaghan at newscorp.com
To: Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com; randruff at rnapartners.com; marilynscade at hotmail.com; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com; sdelbianco at netchoice.org
CC: berrycobb at infinityportals.com; sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com; bc-gnso at icann.org
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:47:36 -0400
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois Review Team

On behalf of News Corporation, David and I support this revised
draft with the broader definition of “consumer” and additional emphasis on
importance of Whois.  Many thanks.

From: Elisa Cooper
[mailto:Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:30 PM

To: Ron Andruff; Marilyn Cade; Lynn Goodendorf; Steve Delbianco

Cc: O'Callaghan, Janet; Berry Cobb; sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com; bc -
GNSO list

Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response
to Whois Review Team

Please
find attached a revised draft which reflects support for a broad definition of
“Consumer” and added emphasis as to why timely, unrestricted and public access
of Whois is important to business.

Best,

Elisa

Elisa
Cooper

Director
of Product Marketing

MarkMonitor

208
389- 5779 PH

From: Ron Andruff
[mailto:randruff at rnapartners.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:02 AM

To: 'Marilyn Cade'; 'Lynn Goodendorf'; 'Steve Delbianco'

Cc: 'Janet Callaghan'; 'Berry Cobb'; sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com; Elisa
Cooper; 'bc - GNSO list'

Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response
to Whois Review Team

I’ll
add RNA Partners voice of support to Lynn’s recommendation for a broader
definition.

Kind
regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

From:
owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marilyn
Cade

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 2:16 AM

To: Lynn Goodendorf; Steve Delbianco

Cc: Janet Callaghan; Berry Cobb; sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com; Elisa
Cooper; bc - GNSO list

Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response
to Whois Review Team

My suggestion is that the BC position should strongly support the broader
definition. All Web and Internet statistics use the concept of individuals who
use the Internet -- e.g. who have access to the Internet.  And, I agree
with Lynn [and others] that the AoC intended to refer to that broader
characterization.  

Does the draft need to make all that clearer
in its language? 

From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com

To: sdelbianco at netchoice.org

CC: jocallaghan at newscorp.com; berrycobb at infinityportals.com;
sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com; Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com; bc-GNSO at icann.org

Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois
Review Team

Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:59:10 -0700

Thanks Steve for this draft and the work of the BC to provide
productive comments.

As an member of the Whois Review Team, I would personally
appreciate support from the BC for the broader definition of
"consumer" as a global Internet user rather than the narrow
definition that would limit the concept of consumers to registrants and ICANN
stakeholders. 

I maintain that the broader definition is consistent with language
in other sections of the AOC that refer to "public interest" and
"Internet users" as well as the policy requirement for public
availability of Whois data.

Also, I believe members of the BC have first hand experience with
the UDRP process and a good understanding of the dependency on Whois data for
dispute resolution.  The BC perspective on this specific need for accurate
and reliable Whois data would be helpful in progressing our work.

Lynn

-------- Original Message
--------

Subject: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois Review Team

From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>

Date: Thu, April 07, 2011 2:46 pm

To: "bc-GNSO at icann.org" <bc-GNSO at icann.org>

Cc: Janet O'Callaghan <jocallaghan at newscorp.com>,
Lynn Goodendorf

<lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>,
Berry Cobb

<berrycobb at infinityportals.com>,
Sarah Deutsch

<sarah.b.deutsch at verizon.com>;,
Elisa Cooper

<Elisa.Cooper at markmonitor.com>;

ICANN is gathering responses to questions posed by the Whois
review team. 

Attached is a discussion draft for BC response prepared by Elisa
Cooper.  (Steve DelBianco added a bit about Whois studies)   

On our last member call, several others also volunteered to add to
this response, so we're looking forward to your additions:

Sara Deutsch

Berry Cobb

Lynn Goodendorf

Janet O'Callaghan

ICANN's Comment period closes
17-Apr.    Today (7-Apr) begins an 8-day review period for this
discussion draft. We can submit this response later if members feel they need
the entire 14-day review and discussion period. 

Please review and post your
suggestions/edits as soon as possible.   If there are no disagreements
noted by 17-Apr, this response will be adopted without a voting period, and
posted to ICANN.

For topic background, see http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#whois-rt 

Thanks again to Elisa Cooper for serving as BC Rapporteur on this.

Regards,

Steve DelBianco

Vice chair for policy coordination

 This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or

confidential information. It is intended solely for the named

addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message

(or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you

may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone.

Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its

attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any

content of this message and its attachments that does not relate to

the official business of News America Incorporated or its

subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any

of them. No representation is made that this email or its

attachments are without defect. 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20110412/94a22dfa/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BC_on_WRT1_ver2-MSC.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 159048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20110412/94a22dfa/BC_on_WRT1_ver2-MSC.docx>