[bc-gnso] Re: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
mike at haven2.com
Wed Feb 8 23:20:10 UTC 2012
i thought Phil Corwin signed up to be rapporteur on this one.
i've been pretty steadily saying that i can't rapporteur this one, so i'd be happy to participate in a conference call with a rapporteur but i just can't dive in at the review/edit level.
sorry to be such a louse -- but i just can't.
On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
> Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.
> As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link)?
> This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.
> From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400
> To: <irtp-b-recommendations at icann.org>
> Cc: "'bc-GNSO at icann.org GNSO list'" <bc-gnso at icann.org>
> Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
> The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.
> If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate.
> This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter.
> Steve DelBianco
> Vice chair for policy coordination
> ICANN Business Constituency
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso