[bc-gnso] FW: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
sdelbianco at netchoice.org
Wed Feb 8 17:36:09 UTC 2012
Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.
As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity (Link<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-b-rec9-part2-23jan12-en.htm>)?
This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.
From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400
To: <irtp-b-recommendations at icann.org<mailto:irtp-b-recommendations at icann.org>>
Cc: "'bc-GNSO at icann.org<mailto:'bc-GNSO at icann.org> GNSO list'" <bc-gnso at icann.org<mailto:bc-gnso at icann.org>>
Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.
If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify recommendations where appropriate.
This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our charter.
Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso