[bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution
randruff at rnapartners.com
Tue Oct 22 22:08:07 UTC 2013
Steve, Anjali, Gabi and colleagues,
The draft BC comment is quite good in recommending a number of means by
which PICS enforcement can be strengthened. Considering that the March
PICDRP was edited down from 8 pages to 4 in this October version, it is
going in the right direction in my view.
I support this good work.
Thanks and kind regards,
From: owner-bc-gnso at icann.org [mailto:owner-bc-gnso at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 21:29
To: bc-gnso at icann.org
Cc: Hansen, Anjali; Gabriela Szlak
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest
Commitments dispute resolution
During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this
Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution
procedure (PICDRP). The BC advocated for public interest commitments
(beyond what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the
DRP. Need a volunteer.
We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the
Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review and
comment. Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions. We will
finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline of 23-Oct.
Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bc-gnso