[bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on Accountability and Transparency Review Team recommendations

[john at crediblecontext.com]

Steve,
 
I think the points made in the comments about the top and bottom pressures are well-stated.  With regard to the cross-community working group section, I would think to add this:
 
An example of how top-down pressure is affecting the legitimacy of the constituencies and stakeholder groups can be seen in the executive appointment of cross community and expert working groups.  It is not our point that the executive cannot convene such panels to help inform the organization's thinking, but the form, function and output of each ought to be aligned with the view of the community.  Right now, the GNSO and ccNSO Councils are collaborating on just such a set of guidelines for the development of meaningful policy by cross community working groups.  The ATRT2 committee should endorse this effort as an effective approach to this particular issue and as a general approach to others as they arise.
 
My two cents.
 
Berard
 
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: BC comment on Accountability and Transparency Review Team recommendations
From: "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
Date: 2/17/14 4:54 pm
To: "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso at icann.org>

 Attached is my first draft BC comment on recommendations from the second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2).  ICANN's comment page is  here and the ATRT2 recommendations are  here.
 
Initial comments close 21-Feb and reply comments close 15 March.  Today begins our 14-day review period, putting us on track to submit comments by 3-March.

 
Marilyn will likely have initial edits, but all BC members are invited to REPLY ALL with edits (using TRACK CHANGES, please).
 

-
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20140218/a56445ec/attachment.html>