[cc-humanrights] [Cc-humanrights3] Draft board human rights commitment / statement

Tatiana Tropina tatiana.tropina at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 11:42:23 UTC 2016

Hi Matt


You were not on the call, but this is exactly was I was trying to point out
on the call, about the possibility to go further than the bylaw language.
The question was why do we need the board's statement then if it rephrases
and repeats the language itself. I still think that it is not a problem if
the board statement is worded closely to the bylaw language. Since the
bylaw won't be operational, the board's commitment to respecting human
rights and continuing the work with the community in the WS2 have more than
a mere symbolic meaning. The statement will show the willingness to commit,
to continue the work and to operationalise the bylaw.

My opinion: the simpler the better.

This is why I think we have to give two options: a simple option and
"forward looking" option.

Best regards

On 11 February 2016 at 12:36, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

> Wasn't on the call but Tatiana I think is pointing the right way.  They
> are two different things.  It seems to me that the commitment we need from
> the Board and perhaps the only one they might give at this stage until the
> FoI is undertaken is the commitment to the work in WS2.  It would be a
> little unusual for them to go further than that given they were already
> skeptical of the bylaw.  The second piece - ICANN's commitment to HR (not
> the Board's as it should be an organizational commitment) - would probably
> come as a result of the FoI.
> On 11/02/2016 11:27, Tatiana Tropina via cc-humanrights3 wrote:
> Dear Niels, dear all,
> after reading this short email exchange with Michele, I realised that may
> be we have to be clearer when we send the proposed wording of the statement
> to the board. I suggest inclusion of the explanation "what it means".
> Furthermore, after the call yesterday I am still not convinced that we can
> be sure that the board wants to go further than the language provided in
> the bylaw. I can suggest as an alternative solution that we send two
> proposed statements: (1) the one we discussed on the call and which is
> based on the bylaw (2) the statement on operationalisation and assessment
> that we drafted after the call.
> In this case, depending on what was the notion behind making this
> statement, the board can either chose one of them or draft a combination of
> two.
> What do you think?
> Cheers
> Tanya
> On 10 February 2016 at 16:29, Niels ten Oever via cc-humanrights3 <
> <cc-humanrights3 at icann.org>cc-humanrights3 at icann.org> wrote:
>> Hash: SHA256
>> Hi Michele,
>> This statement means that the ICANN board will:
>> 1. operationalize it's commitment to human rights
>> 2. contribute to a Human Rights Impact Assessment with the community
>> of stakeholders
>> 3. contribute to the development of a Human Rights Policy with the
>> community of stakeholders
>> 4. work on a process for remediation.
>> Does this make it more clear? If not, can you make your question a bit
>> more precise?
>> Best,
>> Niels
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>> On 02/10/2016 04:24 PM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>> > The board of ICANN commits to take concrete steps to
>> >>> operationalize its core value of respecting human rights
>> >>> within ICANN's mission. The steps will include working together
>> >>> with the community to understand the potential human rights
>> >>> impacts of its operations through a human rights impact
>> >>> assessment, engagement of the board, management, staff and
>> >>> stakeholders toward a common understanding of priority human
>> >>> rights issues, and putting in place a human rights policy to
>> >>> address the priority issues.
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>> Q9DruZSb77SAJD8Owser8HYB+Ak0mWAMEqNNv6g0TvwpTauD/nwxNBEFdM5aqMMi
>> VgETpCQ17rRCH89lOR7gwpAR4HOEkUNfiWonDR977Hc4AxyMqKEE6yx4WD02a1pe
>> rzjbVW7i7GCXCTlGpNQMGJMLky/atQnkCbRmXG7DtWR/tXiMLkMBXsa0NaalTcsy
>> LnTXNGwuFD8peQHWNRm7FBsmuQF1bgJp8nZiGfRieSVSJ8R+kkMpaXRAIyat/Ps=
>> =tx9Q
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-humanrights3 mailing list
>> cc-humanrights3 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights3
> _______________________________________________
> cc-humanrights3 mailing listcc-humanrights3 at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-humanrights3
> --
> Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
> Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
> E: mshears at cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987
> CDT's Annual Dinner, Tech Prom, is April 6, 2016. Don't miss out - register at cdt.org/annual-dinner.
> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cc-humanrights/attachments/20160211/bd696db5/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the cc-humanrights mailing list