[cc-humanrights] Suggested workflow for trial HRIAs
akriti at cis-india.org
Mon Nov 12 09:49:14 UTC 2018
As Collin mentioned, it would be to good to get something started while
we await the final approval and implementation of WS2.
I think the EPDP would be a good place to start for 2 reasons. Firstly
the unique nature of it. There will be more opportunity in the future to
do HRIA's for other PDP's but since EPDP's are rarer, it would be good
to get a HRIA for it done while we can?
Secondly, since Collin has had the opportunity and will probably
continue to have the chance to participate in the EPDP, it will be
easier for us to catch up and have more insight into the process? Feel
free to disagree and let me know if that doesn't make sense though!
On 09/11/2018 20:25, Collin Kurre wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> Below is a suggested workflow synthesizing ideas about how to get the
> ball rolling on HRIAs in the ICANN community while helping newcomers
> become more involved in policy development processes.
> As approval of WS2 is drawing ever closer, it would be great to go
> ahead and get started on the first trial HRIA. This way we can have at
> least one trial under our belt when the Human Rights Bylaw kicks into
> effect. (Find background resources on the CCWP-HR website
> *What do you think?* All feedback welcome.
> Warm regards,
> Collin Kurre
> *_Suggested Workflow for Trial ICANN Policy HRIA_*
> 1. *Identify PDP for trial*. Suggestions received: RPMs, Subsequent
> Procedures (specific work tracks?), EPDP. /Which should be
> 2. *Gather and review resources on select PDP*. This will be an
> important step for members who aren’t currently active in the
> target PDP. Shared folders and communication channels will be
> established to promote knowledge exchange.
> 3. *HRIA Team attends at least 3 meetings of the PDP* to get a feel
> for the group’s status and key players. Newcomers will also have
> the opportunity to shadow veterans and observe the PDP process in
> 4. *Jointly determine the best approach for carrying out the
> assessment* based on shared experiences in the target PDP. Example
> methodologies: direct participation, interviews, mailing list
> reviews, desk research, or any combination thereof. We can
> dedicate one of our CCWP-HR calls to this discussion.
> 5. *Complete and publish assessment* with the methodology clearly
> explained in an annex.
> 6. *Repeat! *Building on lessons learned in the first trial.
> cc-humanrights mailing list
> cc-humanrights at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cc-humanrights