[Ccpdp-rm] On RFC1591 and "binding"

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I have put this also in the chat.

I am not hung up on why we discuss binding. So while we do it because
of scripture we can extend it on its merits.

el

On 2021-04-21 23:14 , Patricio Poblete wrote:
> Eberhard,
> 
> The FoI did not speak of a review in the context of Delegations, which 
> is where the RFC1591 mentions the IDNB. It does mention the right of 
> appeal in the context of revocation.
> 
> Why does it matter to me? Because I think that the binding or not 
> binding nature of a review should be discussed on its own merits, not 
> because some old piece of scripture that was never implemented said so. 
> I think that we will make a stronger case that way.
> 
> Patricio
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse   \         /       Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
el at lisse.NA             / *      |  Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht  \      /  If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia           ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply