[Area 4] Compromise of a resource critical to some accountability process as a candidate scenario.

[Rudolph Daniel]

I would also like to know the reason ICANN chose to register in Calif.
Other jurisdictions were considered at the time.

Rudi Daniel
ICT consulting & LED lighting
784 430 9235
On Dec 18, 2014 1:57 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>
wrote:

>  Dear Colleagues,
>
> ICANN has disclosed that the email credentials of several members of staff
> have been compromised. [1]
>
> I suggest that a credible scenario is the compromise of some resource
> critical to some accountability process. The form of compromise may be loss
> of the resource, such as the loss of a cryptographic key, or the disclosure
> of the resource, such as email credentials.
>
> The accountability process compromised could be any one or more of the
> Corporation's ByLaws Redress Mechanisms [2], or those which are external to
> the Corporation [3].
>
> I will follow up with Staff on the existing Business Continuity Plan of
> Record, as credential loss and/or disclosure should fall within the
> Corporation's BC PoR, and it may be somewhat pertinent at the moment.
>
> Regards,
> Eric Brunner-Williams
> Eugene, Oregon
>
>
> [1] https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en
> [2] (a) Reconsideration, (b) Independent third-party review, (c) Periodic
> review, and (d) Ombudsman.
> [3] (a) Affirmation of Commitments, (b) Jurisdiction of California and the
> United States, (c) Other Jurisdictions, and (d) Contractual requirements.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list
> Ccwg-accountability4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability4/attachments/20141218/3cd33319/attachment.html>