[Area 4] Compromise of a resource critical to some accountability process as a candidate scenario

Rudolph Daniel rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 19:05:01 UTC 2014


Eric
Independent and has potential for increased risk after transition.

Rudi Daniel
ICT consulting & LED lighting
784 430 9235
On Dec 18, 2014 2:46 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>
wrote:

>  Rudi,
>
> Fine. That's a known threat with a process in place. Can you tie that into
> any specific accountability process involved with the hypothetical transfer
> of authority from the NTIA to some successor entity or is this a threat
> that is independent of contract renewal and/or a transfer of the
> contracting authority?
>
> Eric
>
> On 12/18/14 10:08 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:
>
> Or/and, I would suggest, the breaking of the rootzone cryptographic keys
> by some entity, individual or agency.
> I am not aware of how unbreakable the current system is.
>
> Rudi Daniel
> ICT consulting & LED lighting
> 784 430 9235
> On Dec 18, 2014 1:57 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>
> wrote:
>
>>  Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> ICANN has disclosed that the email credentials of several members of
>> staff have been compromised. [1]
>>
>> I suggest that a credible scenario is the compromise of some resource
>> critical to some accountability process. The form of compromise may be loss
>> of the resource, such as the loss of a cryptographic key, or the disclosure
>> of the resource, such as email credentials.
>>
>> The accountability process compromised could be any one or more of the
>> Corporation's ByLaws Redress Mechanisms [2], or those which are external to
>> the Corporation [3].
>>
>> I will follow up with Staff on the existing Business Continuity Plan of
>> Record, as credential loss and/or disclosure should fall within the
>> Corporation's BC PoR, and it may be somewhat pertinent at the moment.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric Brunner-Williams
>> Eugene, Oregon
>>
>>
>> [1] https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en
>> [2] (a) Reconsideration, (b) Independent third-party review, (c) Periodic
>> review, and (d) Ombudsman.
>> [3] (a) Affirmation of Commitments, (b) Jurisdiction of California and
>> the United States, (c) Other Jurisdictions, and (d) Contractual
>> requirements.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list
>> Ccwg-accountability4 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability4/attachments/20141218/991f4ed7/attachment.html>


More information about the Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list