[Area 4] Compromise of a resource critical to some accountability process as a candidate scenario.

[Rudolph Daniel]

Eric
Trival pursuit it may be...not sure.
Is there a possibility that the IANA function be registered elsewhere With
revised "affair. Of commit"...for control & protection of the icann board?
...or ..maybe not in area4's scenario?

Rudi Daniel
ICT consulting &LED lighting
784 430 9235
On Dec 18, 2014 2:36 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>
wrote:

 Rudi,

If I recall correctly the incorporators worked for Jones Day, and their
acts as incorporators were approved by the initial Board on 10-25-98.

 ISI, where Dr. Jon Postel was employed, and the IANA Function conducted
(mostly by Jon), is a unit of USC.

You can of course ask Ira, as he may know, or you can ask any of Esther,
Michael, or Louis.

I don't recall any other jurisdictions being considered at the time,
Deleware is the usual, but really offers little advantage.

In any event, trivial pursuits of early ICANNia is off-topic for the CCWG,
and WG4.

Eric


On 12/18/14 10:16 AM, Rudolph Daniel wrote:

I would also like to know the reason ICANN chose to register in Calif.
Other jurisdictions were considered at the time.

Rudi Daniel
ICT consulting & LED lighting
784 430 9235
On Dec 18, 2014 1:57 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>
wrote:

>  Dear Colleagues,
>
> ICANN has disclosed that the email credentials of several members of staff
> have been compromised. [1]
>
> I suggest that a credible scenario is the compromise of some resource
> critical to some accountability process. The form of compromise may be loss
> of the resource, such as the loss of a cryptographic key, or the disclosure
> of the resource, such as email credentials.
>
> The accountability process compromised could be any one or more of the
> Corporation's ByLaws Redress Mechanisms [2], or those which are external to
> the Corporation [3].
>
> I will follow up with Staff on the existing Business Continuity Plan of
> Record, as credential loss and/or disclosure should fall within the
> Corporation's BC PoR, and it may be somewhat pertinent at the moment.
>
> Regards,
> Eric Brunner-Williams
> Eugene, Oregon
>
>
> [1] https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-12-16-en
> [2] (a) Reconsideration, (b) Independent third-party review, (c) Periodic
> review, and (d) Ombudsman.
> [3] (a) Affirmation of Commitments, (b) Jurisdiction of California and the
> United States, (c) Other Jurisdictions, and (d) Contractual requirements.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list
> Ccwg-accountability4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability4/attachments/20141218/68866140/attachment.html>