[Area 4] 40 items added

[Eric Brunner-Williams]

I asked (up thread):
> In this scenario, who is ICANN suing?

I see. After (assuming it happens) the transition from the current 
NTIA-ICANN fact pattern, in some subsequent future transition, from a 
situation we don't yet know to some other situation we also don't yet 
know, the current ICANN, hypothesized to be the IANA Functions operator 
after the current contract (and possibly its one, or two extensions), 
will sue some other entity to prevent that other entity from becoming 
the IANA Functions operator.

I'm clear now. The scenario addresses a potential transition after the 
transition-possibly-in-progress.

Thanks for the clarification.

Eric Brunner-Williams
Eugene, Oregon

On 1/14/15 3:30 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On 14/01/2015 23:07, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>> I think this is the last question I will ask about #23.
> Sorry I came a little late on this but I think I explained my thinking
> in a message just a moment ago. I was *not* speaking about the back-end
> operator. I was speaking about the "IANA operator" thus ICANN at present.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>