[ST-WP] Draft analysis of public comments on Stress Tests, for ST Meeting | 11:00 UTC | 7 October

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

Noted Jorge...
On 7 Oct 2015 3:52 pm, <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I apologize for missing this important call.
>
> However, following-up with my request in LA, and apart from conversations
> within the GAC, I would want to kindly ask the team to work on the needed
> new rationale for ST18, as in LA it was aknowledged that the prior one did
> not "hold water".
>
> Thanks and looking forward to further discussions,
>
> regards
>
> Jorge
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> > Am 07.10.2015 um 01:31 schrieb Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org
> >:
> >
> > (Trying again since attachments failed on first attempt)
> >
> > Stress Test team,
> >
> > It’s time for us to analyze public comments regarding Stress Tests in
> the CCWG 2nd draft proposal. First attachment is a PDF version of the
> public comments on Stress Tests, extracted from the PC Tool excel sheet
> compiled by ICANN staff.
> >
> > Second attachment is a first draft of our analysis document, for
> discussion on our ST team call tomorrow (call details below).
> >
> > —Steve and Cheryl
> > <PC2 tool - Stress Test tab.pdf>
> > <Stress Tests - analysis of PC2.docx>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list
> > Ccwg-accountability4 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability4/attachments/20151007/bb7977ce/attachment.html>