[Acct-Legal] Draft answers to Apr 17 memo

Thu Apr 23 02:14:31 UTC 2015

Thanks, Leon.  I've got comments on these proposed answers.

1.  On 1A I think we should add that there are different priorities for some of the community powers we seek and not all weigh them equally.  There seems to be a gradation of how much enforcement can be achieved on some of these powers and so it isn't quite a binary choice for many of us of total air tight enforcement or not.  What can be achieved in between?  That's a factor for our discussion.

2.  I am not comfortable saying that we prefer the membership model in answer 4a.  I think this point needs more discussion among both the CCWG generally and with the lawyers about what can be achieved.

3.  I do not think we should include 5e as it will likely create more problems than solve.

4.  On 2a, I want a full exploration of what be achieved before we decide if we can't have 100% air tightness we write off a model.

Those are my comments on this document.  I think we are pretty far apart on a number of key points.

Thanks,
Robin

On Apr 22, 2015, at 5:05 PM, List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal SubTeam wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Further to our call today, I am attaching a red-line and clean version of the draft answers to the questions raised by counsel on their April 17 memo for your review.
> 
> I believe all comments raised have been taken into account but if anyone spots something missing please do let me know in order to include it.
> 
> Please reply with your agreement or comments at your earliest convenience. If I don’t get objections by tomorrow 7:00 UTC I will circulate to the main list for comment.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> <Draft Answers to questions on 17-Apr Memo consolidated comments.docx><Draft Answers to questions on 17-Apr Memo consolidated comments.pdf><Draft Answers to questions on 17-Apr Memo consolidated comments clean.docx><Draft Answers to questions on 17-Apr Memo consolidated comments clean.pdf>
> 
> León
> 
>> El 21/04/2015, a las 16:59, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> escribió:
>> 
>> Thanks Eberhard,
>> 
>> There wasn't a question on whether Chris's questions would be passed it not. It was always clear they were going to be assigned. The only thing pointed was the Unlikeliness on the feasibility of having the answers from the lawyers in time for our call today. 
>> 
>> Questions have been assigned already. 
>> 
>> Best regards 
>> 
>> León 
>> 
>> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>> 
>>> El abr 21, 2015, a las 3:11 PM, List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal SubTeam <ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org> escribió:
>>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Whether to pass on his questions, perhaps?
>>> 
>>> el
>>> 
>>> On 2015-04-21 20:54 , List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal
>>> SubTeam wrote:
>>>> Dear Eberhard,
>>>> 
>>>> Which decisions?
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> León
>>> [...]
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>> 
>>> iQIVAwUBVTau4pcFHaN5RT+rAQLOpxAAny5uB1vwMEGOiWHdC5S8WqRnGuDxpXXd
>>> hgLAkwYS+xWMhYq8Z1x2NV7E1o0MvRlv1qHj8LkobY0MhL4jhaJMCNXqJtesNoXB
>>> Yn/jiIyt3f/7CJO8Ib/rqrhTzc+rND3iPPN6RGKifYOlHRjhEN4CvgSImBx8GOpp
>>> /fqbNPjmQOJpmfSJGZBC3X7/HTnmzcETGL+8LvowtumrAlG/z4hC2vuRqo9Xab5z
>>> UudfhyOwdAOLSq1EyE3BjhTw+TcL44WpGV+eEScPW12eNN81/sFvFWyHU14aG5zh
>>> Wkz9HyCP/tygQA+qQ8d1iCnsie21ongr6UcIlkceA+Ts+0tYbJE2iwY0I+B7Ob29
>>> 4S+hZuEPtH7iCzalhafPeqAfGgt6iWCaGSbUXFe1R+C5DuZ3F7T83YCxd5YQr6Lt
>>> Q8oZguEOA75KQvZ+HnHQrqRzkWFO/RNEvYXWpFt5vdF0aX/BauMO4kA28GZTOYky
>>> 23rc4Vl0bzWKK8S3Zz+uaaNy6ZFTFss+cnUDy+Dep3otNUyLpoKNROAHy5nph5Xt
>>> bjMoAjXEofTkRvwRPBlnN99vMi9Eqh1LQepA8WEVaRphpwKgdEk1TktrW8Um7fnm
>>> CthI3+VbablKYcBrfDVfAqnB2ebynkn+Df3ew1tK7yTahKUn9Ti0/fILZoenbBC1
>>> d+31nW1T8i0=
>>> =4eG/
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
>>> Ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
> Ccwg-accountability5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/attachments/20150422/1ad9f86e/signature.asc>