[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Proposed Agenda and documents - CCWG Auction Proceeds

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Apr 25 20:07:26 UTC 2017


At 25/04/2017 02:39 PM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:

>Hello Marika,
>
>Thanks for this, I like to note a tentative 
>apology for the upcoming call (due to personal 
>family needs). However, I have just a 2 quick comments:
>
>1. On the letter, I don't think there was a poll 
>to check how many members indicated that 10% 
>overhead would be appropriate. Hence I feel the 
>use of the word several might be misleading. I 
>will actually suggest to remove the following text:
>"Several CCWG members/participants did point 
>out, however, that an overhead around 10% is 
>fairly standard based on the experience of CCWG 
>members/participants in different funding and project related environments."

I support keeping the statement. It sends an 
important message that 5% may not be sufficient 
and we should not even imply that we are taking 
this as an absolute target until we understand the situation better.


>2. On question 7, why are we  recommending a 
>trust for this?, sure I agree that it will be 
>helpful to have other entities handle the "end 
>point" applications while ICANN just administer 
>the funds at high level so long as those 
>entities meets the requirements to be set by the 
>ccwg. I think recommending to ICANN to setup a 
>trust in itself could result to more overhead 
>cost, unless there is a reason to believe this 
>kind of funds will be available on a continuous 
>basis in that case a "foundation" may be a good thing to consider.

I don't see any reference to a trust. There is a 
reference to whether we will trust and external body.

However, the charter question is an either/or. 
The first bullet point suggest the answer may be "Yes"

Alan


>Regards
>
>On Apr 25, 2017 18:06, "Marika Konings" 
><<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>
>Dear All,
>
>
>
>Please find below the proposed agenda for the 
>next CCWG Auction Proceeds meeting which has 
>been scheduled for Thursday 27 April at 14.00 
>UTC. Note that the leadership team has reviewed 
>the comments received on the draft response the 
>Board, also factoring in the discussion during 
>the last meeting, and would like to propose the 
>attached draft as the response to be sent to the 
>ICANN Board. If you have any comments and/or 
>edits, please share this ahead of the meeting with the mailing list.
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>
>
>Marika
>
>
>
>Proposed agenda for new gTLD Auction Proceeds 
>CCWG meeting on Thursday 27 April at 14.00 UTC
>
>
>
>1.       Start of meeting – roll call
>
>2.       Welcome & updates to DOIs
>
>3.       Response to ICANN Board letter (see updated draft attached)
>
>4.       Review of updates approach for dealing 
>with charter questions and associated work plan 
>(see updated approach and updated work plan attached)
>
>5.       Initial run through of charter question 5 (see attached template)
>
>6.       Initial run through of charter question 
>7, if time allows (see attached template)
>
>7.       Confirm next meeting – Thursday 11 May at 14.00 UTC
>
>
>
>Marika Konings
>
>Vice President, Policy Development Support – 
>GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigneed Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>Email: <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>marika.konings at icann.org
>
>
>
>Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
>
>Find out more about the GNSO by taking our 
><http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso>interactive 
>courses and visiting the 
><http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>GNSO 
>Newcomer pages.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
><mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;DM5PR03MB2714;27:CVHbbi8SghJc/0+nXklVDc08BlBjemY7X+Y8QLMLmabAVei5lZD4Bv9BHqANp/65/TJHAbB9M/pswu37VpQNdqDfJ+VitCNt0yVaks+vxYoOdVg+2jyU3qmOsRorIecSpwN5H8yxmWF/zt+VgDPsdA==
>X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
>         ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028);
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170425/80a20ac2/attachment.html>


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list