[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Please participate in doodle poll - ICANN60 planning

Olga Cavalli olgacavalli at gmail.com
Wed Aug 23 14:24:13 UTC 2017


Dear Marika, dear Manal,

thanks Manal for the commens, so these limitations are the same for me.

Best
Olga

2017-08-23 10:47 GMT-03:00 Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>:

> Dear Marika ..
>
> Many thanks for the doodle poll ..
>
> It's difficult for me to commit to any of the slots as 3 of the 4
> referenced conflicting cross community discussions are already proposed by
> the GAC ..
>
> Friday may be an option depending on the GAC agenda on that day, which is
> still not clear ..
>
> So I’ll do my best to attend, but I don't want to influence the decision
> as I'm not sure I'll be able to make it ..
>
> Kind Regards
>
> --Manal
>
>
>
> *From:* ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:15 PM
> *To:* ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Please participate in doodle poll -
> ICANN60 planning
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> The leadership team would like to request your input on the scheduling for
> ICANN60. Originally, the CCWG-AP meeting was scheduled for Thursday 2
> November from 10.30 – 15.00 (with a break for lunch). Based on subsequent
> discussions by the SO/AC leadership, a number of cross-community discussion
> topics have now been placed on the agenda which creates a potential
> conflict (see ICANN60 block schedule attached). In order to decide whether
> or not to keep the meeting as is, shorten the meeting or move it to another
> slot, the leadership team would like you to provide your input by
> completing the following doodle poll: https://icannorg.doodle.com/
> poll/atbdds59ii7ru3cs. Please use ‘yes’ for your preferred option, ‘could
> do if I have to (yes)’ for alternatives that you could live with and ‘no’
> if you do not support and/or would not be able to participate. Note, that
> some of the alternative options also would mean the meeting would run in
> parallel to other sessions – as many of you know, a meeting without any
> type of conflict does unfortunately not exist at an ICANN meeting….As
> always, remote participation will be available for those that are not
> planning to travel in person to ICANN60.
>
>
>
> As the time/date of the meeting needs to be confirmed as soon as possible,
> please provide your feedback by Wednesday 23 August COB at the latest.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *Marika Konings*
>
> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>
> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>
>
>
> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>
> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170823/c4895487/attachment.html>


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list