[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate - survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds

[喬敬]

the survey page says it's closed now....

On 8/24/17, Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com> wrote:
> Yes, keep it open Marika!
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Not having seen any immediate objections, I’ve gone ahead and re-opened
>> the survey. Please submit your responses by 22.00 UTC at the latest.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Carolina
>> Caeiro <carolina at lacnic.net>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 14:24
>> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate -
>> survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Are there any problems with re-opening the survey for a couple extra
>> hours, say 10:00PM UTC? I was awaiting for some feedback and missed the
>> deadline for some 20 minutes. I think this should still give us
>> sufficient
>> time for review ahead of tomorrow's meeting and some other group members
>> might be in a similar situation?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Carolina
>>
>>
>>
>> El 23/8/17 a las 15:14, Marika Konings escribió:
>>
>> Please note that this poll has now been closed. You are encouraged to
>> review the results ahead of tomorrow’s meeting here:
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-K3MK9MY5/[surveymonkey.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_results_SM-2DK3MK9MY5_&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=o7RmJCwXVgbzxpnjhadXFvFU9MXfWgIEKEx7RKKQt7c&s=O2k7QhFCI1R3KLRPluuMW-wAcIJn9B1MM4446-xw6ZE&e=>.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>
>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings
>> <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>
>> *Date: *Monday, August 21, 2017 at 12:03
>> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER Re: Please participate -
>> survey re. whether ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
>>
>>
>>
>> Reminder – please participate in the poll if you have not done so yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>
>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings
>> <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, August 15, 2017 at 06:12
>> *To: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>> <jrobinson at afilias.info>,
>> 'Seun Ojedeji' <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>, "Xavier
>> J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org> <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Please participate - survey re. whether
>> ICANN Org should be able to apply for funds
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan, thank you for your suggestion and others for chiming in. In
>> consultation with the leadership team, staff has put together a short
>> survey to obtain CCWG input on the questions you have outlined below
>> which
>> will hopefully help inform the CCWG deliberations on this topic. To
>> participate in the survey, please go to https://www.surveymonkey.com/
>> r/HRRV93W[surveymonkey.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_HRRV93W&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=_T1cLFkwn8kLi5jr9uCCI3cTUNSqX0Cv-wIVN_Xqpqc&s=YWSOX8e-LtaTRwYSpnCY2VJtJ6ujbtxMW5EzSdyanhQ&e=>.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You are requested to provide your input by Wednesday 23 August at 18.00
>> UTC at the latest.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>
>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson
>> <jrobinson at afilias.info> <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>> *Organization: *Afilias
>> *Reply-To: *Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>> <jrobinson at afilias.info>
>> *Date: *Friday, August 11, 2017 at 03:11
>> *To: *'Seun Ojedeji' <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>,
>> "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org> <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org> <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's
>> CCWG-AP meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> A couple of thoughts on this topic.
>>
>>
>>
>> On the subject of whether or not ICANN should have a 12 month operating
>> expense reserve in place.
>>
>> Agreed that it seems to be common practice in the not for profit sector.
>>
>> Whether or not it should be the case for ICANN is an interesting
>> question,
>> but agreed, not one for this CWG.
>>
>>
>>
>> In any event, Xavier has clarified that the current policy is that the
>> level of operating reserve should be 12 months.
>>
>> My understanding of the question for this group is not whether or not we
>> would sanction the (auction fund) money being used to top up the
>> reserves.
>>
>> But rather, whether or not we would like to see rules in place that
>> sanction ICANN (the organisation) applying for auction funds.
>>
>>
>>
>> In evaluating that question of ICANN the organisation as a prospective
>> applicant, a use or test case for that consideration is ICANN applying
>> (under the same rules as anyone else) for auction funds to top up the
>> ICANN
>> reserve funds.
>>
>>
>>
>> My personal view is that ICANN should be demonstrating a commitment to
>> fulfilling its current policy (to have in place a 12 month reserve) by
>> budgeting an operating surplus to build that reserve.
>>
>> In addition (independently of this CWG), ICANN should review its current
>> policy on reserve funds.
>>
>> If these two criteria were met, it would make me personaly much more
>> sympathetic to potentially topping up reserve funds (to some extent) with
>> auction funds.
>>
>>
>>
>> At the risk of being repetitive, it seems to me that the question for
>> this
>> CWG remains:
>>
>>    - Whether or not ICANN the Organisation should be permitted to apply
>>    for funds?
>>    and
>>    - If so, what constraints should be place on this (use of funds,
>>    quantum etc)?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Seun Ojedeji [mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
>> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>]
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:18 AM
>> *To:* Xavier J. Calvez <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>> <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>> *Cc:* ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's
>> CCWG-AP meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Xavier is right about reserve that covers operational expenses for
>> minimum
>> is say 12 month being normal practice. Some even do it for more; some
>> RIRs
>> have way above 1 year already while others are working towards same.
>> However ofcourse none can match the fat figures of ICANN budget. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> However I don't think auction proceeds in this context can be referred to
>> as surplus that can get ploughed back to achieve reserve target set by
>> ICANN management NOR do I think it is a target/goal that this group
>> should
>> try to achieve.
>>
>>
>>
>> I for will suggest that we should consider mechanisms that allow some
>> community projects that ICANN normally fund in their budget to be
>> eligible,
>> which if approved (based on the process) may then result to more
>> surpluses
>> to ICANN and they(Board) can decide to put that to reserve.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my mobile
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2017 10:26 PM, "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez at icann.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I apologize if I did not make the following clear: ICANN’s current policy
>> is to have in place a reserve fund equivalent to at minimum 12 months of
>> operating expenses. Refer to ICANN’s Investment Policy, see at
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/investment-
>> policy-2014-07-30-en[icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_investment-2Dpolicy-2D2014-2D07-2D30-2Den&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=Dww8xHmK4zEHqHK0lHK7IdorPuvHkXKk1luyeB5pBxQ&s=rcBRrG4RZelJUExS-glQJgvDHB75hZlkZOX7O2qDG_A&e=>,
>> see the paragraph “Size of Funds”, copied below).
>>
>>
>>
>> “The Reserve Fund shall contain any amounts not contained in the
>> Operating
>> Fund. Any surplus funds will be used to build up the Reserve Fund to a
>> balance sufficient to cover an emergency requirement. The Reserve Fund is
>> expected to reach and maintain a level of funds to maintain a minimum of
>> 12
>> months of expected expenditures.“
>>
>>
>>
>> I indicated that this level of a reserve fund is the commonly used in
>> non-profit organizations.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Xavier
>>
>>
>>
>> Xavier Calvez
>>
>> ICANN – SVP & CFO
>>
>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>
>> Los Angeles, CA 90094
>>
>> Phone:   310-301-5838 <(310)%20301-5838>
>>
>> Mobile:  805-312-0052 <(805)%20312-0052>
>>
>> Fax:        310-957-2348 <(310)%20957-2348>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Alan
>> Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> *Date: *Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 1:41 PM
>> *To: *Dietmar Stefitz <djs at bemarnet.es>, Michael Karanicolas <
>> mkaranicolas at gmail.com>, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Notes & action items from today's
>> CCWG-AP meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> To be clear, I don't think anyone on the call suggested we build up the
>> reserve to a 12 or 24 month level of current budget. Xavier said that 1
>> year was a typical norm for non-profits, but in my opinion, there is no
>> need for that, as in the case of emergency, costs could be ramped down
>> quickly.
>>
>> I vaguely recall that the level that we were targeting (before the drain
>> from the CCWG-Acct expenses) was something like $80m. So even if we
>> contributed enough to get back to that level, it would be perhaps $40m.
>>
>> But the issue in my mind is not how much, but if.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> At 10/08/2017 03:28 PM, Dietmar Stefitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Erika and all,
>>
>> I have been very astonished to hear the proposal to use the Auction Money
>> in filling up the reserve account of ICANN.
>> Filling up for 12 month reserve or 24 month reserve, if we have to take
>> 24
>> month, there will not be much left to disburse to other projects.
>>
>> I thought that the call from Xavier has been to explain specially the
>> Investment of the fund at this moment, for which I can only congratulate.
>> A 1% return on a super save investment is not bad, and it should be made
>> like this in the future.
>>
>> I would absolutely be against a filling up of the reserve fund from the
>> auction proceeds, at least as a decision from this group.
>> Or did I misunderstand something?
>>
>> Dietmar Stefitz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thursday, August 10, 2017, 8:05:56 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *MK> Hi Kavouss, MK> Am I missing something - or are you suggesting that
>> the CCWG should MK> only determine whether or not money be fed into
>> ICANN's
>> reserve MK> account, without also indicating what proportion should be
>> used
>> to MK> that effect? MK> If so - I don't see how the CCWG could consider
>> anything beyond that MK> simple yes/no question, as we'd have no
>> indication
>> how much money we MK> would have leftover to work with, once the reserve
>> is
>> replenished. MK> Decisions about allocation priorities can't really be
>> made
>> unless we MK> also look at how the pie should be portioned out, right?
>> MK>
>> Michael Karanicolas MK> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Kavouss Arasteh
>> MK> <* kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *> wrote: >> Dear Erika, Dear All, >> Today during the last 15 mints of
>> the call I tried to draw your attention to >> allow me to intervene on
>> the
>> views expressed by Alan reading the Reserve >> account. >> If I have well
>> understood his statement he wanted that CCWG discuss the >> level of
>> ICANN
>> reserve account which was announced by Xavier to be >> equivalent to one
>> year budget as objective. As Xavier mentioned this level >> has not been
>> reached. >> Alan’s view that CCWG discuss the level of ICANN reserve
>> account is outside*
>> * >> the mandate of CCWG. We may just decide whether or not that account
>> be fed*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * >> by using Auction money but decision on the appropriate level of the
>> reserve >> account is totally outside or mandate as it is a decision to
>> be
>> made by the >> Board and not by this group >> Regards >> Kavouss >> On
>> Thu,
>> Aug 10, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Joke Braeken <*joke.braeken at icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *> >> wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> Please find below the notes and action
>> items from today’s CCWG-AP meeting.*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> Best regards,*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> Joke Braeken*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> Notes CCWG – AP Meeting 10 August 2017:*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> These high-level notes are designed to help the CCWG navigate
>> through the*
>>
>>
>> * >>> content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the
>> transcript >>> and/or recording. The MP3, transcript, and chat are
>> provided
>> separately and >>> are posted on the wiki at: *
>> https://community.icann.org/x/DLHDAw[community.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_DLHDAw&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=6OyX-H7GEmBCRJWXNDGE46VvO6oDVoRB82Z2AeomXAg&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *. >>> Roll Call >>> Please state your name for transcription purposes
>> and
>> keep microphones on >>> mute when not speaking. >>> Attendance will be
>> taken from the AdobeConnect room. >>> Welcome – DOI*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> Overview from Xavier Calvez on investment management >>> The
>> intention of this presentation is >>> to allow the group to think on the
>> issue of investment, >>> to understand ICANN's practice, and to answer
>> any
>> questions that might be >>> raised. >>> It helps to inform the discussion
>> on the ROI of the fund; It includes an >>> overview of how the auction
>> proceeds are currently managed, which might lead >>> to how they might be
>> managed in the future. >>> Important to note: >>> only conservative
>> investment policies are being used >>> the investment strategy will be
>> designed in support of the objectives >>> An overview of some
>> illustrative
>> investment scenarios was provided, >>> followed by Q&A. >>> Parameters
>> that
>> need to be considered: >>> amount of money >>> horizon >>> level of risk
>> (which is not correlated to the horizon) >>> Financial information is
>> regularly provided during the quarterly >>> stakeholder calls. >>>
>> (amount
>> from latest update - Q3 data of FY17. *>>> https://www.icann.org/
>> quarterlyreports[icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_quarterlyreports&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=baFsmaqAdvnSkJG4eoXhzZNn5-StHSA9z08s4kUvK4E&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *) >>> Reserve Fund: 64 million >>> New gTLD unspent application fees:
>> 128
>> million >>> Auction proceeds: 233 million >>> Annual budget of ICANN.
>> FY18
>> budget expenses 142 million USD. >>> Regarding replenishing the reserve
>> fund: appropriate procedures need to be >>> taken, appropriate approvals
>> and decisions need to be in place for it to be >>> legal. >>> This is
>> however a moral question as well. The charter does include this >>>
>> question: “To what extent (and, if so, how) could ICANN, the
>> Organization
>> or*
>> * >>> a constituent part thereof, be the beneficiary of some of the
>> auction funds†*
>>
>> * >>> The group needs to discuss this at a later stage.*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> Next meeting*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> next CCWG-AP meeting is scheduled for Thursday 24 August at 14.00
>> UTC*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> = = = = >>> Action item #1: >>> CCWG to review the slides presented
>> by Xavier (published on *>>> https://community.icann.org/
>> display/CWGONGAP/2017-08-10+CCWG+New+gTLD+Auction+
>> Proceeds+call[community.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_CWGONGAP_2017-2D08-2D10-2BCCWG-2BNew-2BgTLD-2BAuction-2BProceeds-2Bcall&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=FQiYsQAxL7CV_3RJCSjIYJtSMgDGoFBN-QeXmJoUPBU&e=>
>> *) >>> and to share any further questions for Xavier on the group’s
>> mailing list.*
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> Action item #2:*
>>
>> * >>> Per the discussion during the CCWG-AP meeting on 27 July 2017, the*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * >>> attached mind map was developed, which aims to regroup the
>> objectives based >>> on the survey results as well as the subsequent
>> discussions.  The CCWG is >>> encouraged to continue to provide feedback
>> on
>> the proposed regrouping of >>> objectives/priorities, as well as the
>> clustering of examples ahead of the >>> next meeting, scheduled for 24
>> August at 14 UTC. >>> Action item #3: >>> CCWG to review responses to
>> charter question #4 and to continue the >>> discussion on the mailing
>> list.
>> >>> (see *https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-6GNDQHJ6/[
>> surveymonkey.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_results_SM-2D6GNDQHJ6_&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=yulKeXnAn5CN2_dNRAj8nx_5IeuwBT4F1Heh3dtZJWI&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * ) >>> = = = = >>> Joke Braeken >>> ccNSO Policy Advisor *>>>
>> joke.braeken at icann.org <joke.braeken at icann.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> *>>> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: *https://twitter.com/ccNSO[twitter.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ccNSO&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=ksIYlCk3ZzcyyNbJFUxushrbiDZC4_lO_WVwmhRrWG4&e=>
>>
>> *>>> Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: *https://www.facebook.com/
>> ccnso/[facebook.com]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_ccnso_&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=K_zzz3ZhAdQ0ckOqfmq_HvpwupZ-DfQbOd39kyGgqsI&e=>
>>
>> >>> http://ccnso.icann.org[ccnso.icann.org]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ccnso.icann.org_&d=DwMFAw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=IWWGaKyGUGcKQNGe7LtArAou7HP6fPR5aWjbPBUFZ3k&m=HKuU-9DAESnqcGMIdaNf5MeIgsXuBdt1W6-AYHyIJIc&s=kopXyX7wBTECByzaEGsPL-Mbcct5zfvtn4kCkugUF3I&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *>>> _______________________________________________ >>>
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *>> _______________________________________________ >>
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
>> *MK> _______________________________________________ MK>
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list *MK> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> MK> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *-- Saludos, Dietmar                     Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition:
>> inline X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
>> 1;MWHPR03MB2718;27:YWDqnEPXx/CS7utzz6td9Qa3koj9je2Sjv9LFnursD0J2VA30AdYQS9BENOC1oqUgmoT+mzlFx7ydYsubIRVesT4Y1jhb3iYxs4FdjVwmhiKOJ9o59lZBh7cDwAsDaB/
>> X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
>> ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(750103)(520002050)(400001001223)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
>> _______________________________________________ Ccwg-auctionproceeds
>> mailing list Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> <Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds>*
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carolina Caeiro
>>
>> *Coordinadora de Proyectos de Desarrollo*
>> Coordinator of Development Projects
>>
>> *www.lacnic.net[lacnic.net]
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lacnic.net&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=o7RmJCwXVgbzxpnjhadXFvFU9MXfWgIEKEx7RKKQt7c&s=PVkvf8owDabNeVxQOitYmtIVe2X_nDxWaySYhlqqj6Y&e=>*
>> * Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry*
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>


-- 
Ching Chiao
Founder & CEO
Brandma Internet Group
中域国际集团
www.brandma.com

+886.918.211372 || +86.135.2018.7032 || +1.908.4990050
Beijing . Chengdu . Hangzhou . Hong Kong . Shenzhen. Taipei