[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] Re: For your review - draft surveys for charter questions #4 and #7

[Marika Konings]

Thanks, Seun. If the CCWG would like to solicit broader input from observers or others, it always has the ability to do so via public comment or another means of communication. This survey is intended to assess the views of the CCWG members and participants and as such it is limited to those groups. As affiliation is clear from the SOIs, it was not captured as a separate question, more so as this is just to gather input to help inform the deliberations, not to assess the level of consensus for one option or another. However, if you think it is important to capture this information, it would be easy to add a question to that end.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, July 2, 2017 at 16:01
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
Cc: "ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - draft surveys for charter questions #4 and #7

Hello Marika,

Thanks for this and it looks great. As to question 4, I think a combination of options 1 and 2 may also be a possible option.

I like the fact that the comment box allows to expand on any option selected. Maybe that would address my comment on question 4.

On another note, is there a reason we are not including observer/other option?[1] I think the questions are quite general in nature and will be good to hear from them as well. I also see we are not capturing the constituency?

Cheers!
1. Missed the face 2 face in jourboug (it skipped as I was right in the ALAC room

On Jul 2, 2017 10:37 AM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear All,

Per the action items from our last meeting, please preview the surveys for charter question #4 and #7 by Wednesday 5 July at the latest. At this stage, you are just requested to review whether the survey and proposed responses align with the different options discussed by the CCWG to date or whether additional ones should be added. The objective is to formally launch the survey on Thursday 6 July to allow for sufficient time for responses prior to our next meeting.


  *   Preview the survey for charter question #4: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=T3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl_2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER_2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3DT3kSoBNHpU6aFAslOl-5F2BzWEHLr1rE9ZJXeKgPUyhbQ0UZER-5F2B8jkWPWIE44oYsHCme&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=rQ7B5bsq86lv7DdsA0hmCFpoYGb-g4RmsIFopSfPAjI&e=>
  *   Preview the survey for charter question #7: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=TInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3DTInwAJeTJZrq97duAhNMVGw2W4v852bsZ1Nw4zFUICHqBu0fEmCCwKSO1mbt3jU8&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=zb_whCaTNu6y229sgmiHXRCiEZVeJDO_r6GmJ2VlgUA&e=>

Note that for both questions, the charter question has been broken into smaller pieces to allow for more detailed input, either as a result of sub-questions that were identified or multiple layers present in the original charter questions.

Please share any comments you may have with the list by Wednesday 5 July (close of business, wherever you are).

Thanks,

Marika

Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=MA9R1a_ETmFW6v3yC93xh_dPToMvDGXoUAzocsVi9EA&e=> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=1lFQA-GOvlYkJ-HG_M5FZKmn41t_u_2f5VrTEUBF2O8&s=MrVKCvU1ZMdoEVqRFRH_wThonsiGLd2obQjqZ8e_ePQ&e=>.


_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170702/c8220da1/attachment-0001.html>