[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Your input request - draft survey to gather input on charter question #2

[Erika Mann]

Daniel - I will reply to your questions/comments tomorrow - in my personal
capacity. I'm traveling today and are in meetings. Thanks for raising these
points.

Greetings,
Erika

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Daniel Dardailler <danield at w3.org> wrote:

> Hello all
>
> I think what's missing from this section on scope is the overall issue of
> all auction benefits going back to ICANN because
>  - it has the funding
>  - its mission legally defines its spending boundaries
>
> (I understand that the funding doesn't have to go back "to ICANN", but to
> fulfilling its mission, but why would ICANN run the risk of funding other
> organizations for doing their job ? At best, ICANN would have to do damage
> control, and at worse, it could be replaced by someone doing a better job
> for the same mission). So in the end, it's likely going to be only ICANN
> controlled/satellite projects)
>
> Originally, the auction benefits were supposed to help do good things for
> the Internet, not just good things for the DNS or IP ecosystem, but it
> looks more and more to me that this won't happen. Please tell me if I
> misunderstood or missed some important bits in this discussion.
>
> Out of curiosity, has ICANN developed a list of things/projects that are
> part of its mission but that it can't fund today, or doesn't want to fund ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2017-05-29 16:15, Marika Konings wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> As discussed during our previous meeting, a next step in addressing
>> charter question #2 (see template attached) could be by soliciting
>> CCWG input through a survey. Staff has worked with the leadership team
>> to prepare a first draft of such a survey for your review:
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=dfpUrnoXn7_2BjCR6
>> XiLIJ6MYfkl50X1ZLBCxF_2FnL8a_2Ff8iTnt5e4rNUUcbC9HhzkK
>> [1]. Note, that this is just a preview, no responses are recorded. You
>> are encouraged to share any feedback you may have on the survey by
>> Wednesday 7 June at the latest. The idea is to launch the survey
>> shortly after the next meeting so that everyone has sufficient time to
>> provide their input ahead of ICANN59.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> _MARIKA KONINGS_
>>
>> _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>>
>> _Email: marika.konings at icann.org  _
>>
>> _ _
>>
>> _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>>
>> _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [2]
>> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [3]. _
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1]
>> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=dfpUrnoXn7_2BjCR6
>> XiLIJ6MYfkl50X1ZLBCxF_2FnL8a_2Ff8iTnt5e4rNUUcbC9HhzkK
>> [2] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso
>> [3]
>> http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presen
>> tations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170601/a7ecbe44/attachment.html>