[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] lotsa money, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Tue Sep 5 15:18:11 UTC 2017


+1

Regards

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Sep 5, 2017 4:16 PM, "James Gannon" <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:

Even if it was its out of scope for this group.

-----Original Message-----
From: ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-
bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Dardailler
Sent: 05 September 2017 16:01
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
Cc: John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com>; ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] lotsa money, was Fwd: Board reply to
CCWG-AP

On 2017-09-05 16:50, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Hello Daniel/Jon
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Dardailler <danield at w3.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-09-05 16:21, Jon Nevett wrote:
>>
>>> Sean:  No refunds from the auction proceeds were committed to or
>>> anticipated. Not sure where this idea is coming from. Jon
>
> SO: Thanks for clarification Jon
>
>>>
>>
>> There was a mixup in the thread at some point between refunding the
>> applicants of the surplus of applicant fees, and refunding the
>> applicants going to auctions using the auction benefits. I think the
>> second is clearly out but I'm still wondering if the first one is a
>> real option.
>
> SO: If by "real option" you mean using auction proceed to refund
> applicants, I don't see why that should be an option at all.

No, I meant using the application legal surplus to refund the applicants
(in the 130M); is that a valid option that could be implemented ?


>
> Regards
>
>> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to that Alberto line of reasoning Alberto. Though it will be good
>> to know if ICANN has indeed legally committed (as per contract) to
>> provide some refunds from auction proceed.
>>
>> If that is the case i don't think its something within our scope to
>> challenge we will just then need to clarify from ICANN how much is
>> really available and accessible in the auction proceeds account.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Alberto Soto
>> <asoto at ibero-americano.org> wrote:
>>
>> do not know how the signed contract is. I do not know if the
>> return is
>> correct. Whoever buys a restaurant and does not get profitability
>> does so at
>> their own risk. Who buys a domain and does not obtain
>> profitability, does so
>> at their own risk. ICANN should not be the guarantee if no
>> profitability is
>> obtained.
>>
>> Regards
>> Alberto
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de
>> Daniel
>> Dardailler
>> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 6:56 AM
>> Para: John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
>> CC: ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> Asunto: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] lotsa money, was Fwd: Board
>> reply to
>> CCWG-AP
>>
>> On 2017-09-04 23:48, John R. Levine wrote:
>> Is the current financial position of ICANN really an impediment
>  to
>
>>> what ICANN wants to do in support of its mission ? I was under
>  the
>
>>> impression that ICANN's budget was healthy enough to implement
>  its
>
>>> mission optimally today, with also a large untouched pot coming
>  from
>
>>> the new gTLD application process (unused legal costs if I
>  understand
>
>>> correctly).
>>
>> Not really.  ICANN's operating budget is fully committed.  There
>  is
>
>> indeed a lot of unspent new gTLD application money, but it's a
>  whole
>
>> separate can of worms.  It's not ours to spend and since ICANN
>  said
>
>> the price was set to cover their costs, the obvious and ethical
>  thing
>
>> to do will be to refund the excess to the applicants.
>
> I kind of agree with the ethical part (although I haven't read the
> contract
> those applicants signed and what was promised in writing) but is
> it really
> going to be obvious to refund hundreds of applicants, some of them
> potentially gone as a business ?
>
>> R's,
>> John
>>
>> PS:
>>
>>> How is it different to give away the funds to the ICANN
>  community
>
>>> (for projects aligned with the ICANN mission) vs. to give them
>  back
>
>>> to the board directly, given that the board is driven by the
>  community ?
>
>> Well, actually, it's the board's money to give away, not ours.
>  We're
>
>> just offering them advice.
>  _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3] [1]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3] [1]
>
> --
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> Seun Ojedeji,
>> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
>> web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng [2]
>> Mobile: +2348035233535 [1]
>> _alt email: [3]seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng_
>>
>> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
>> action!
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3]
>
>  Links:
> ------
> [1] https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3]
> [2] http://www.fuoye.edu.ng/
> [3] http://goog_1872880453/
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3]
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> Seun Ojedeji,
>> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
>> web:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
>> Mobile: +2348035233535
>> _alt email: [2]seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng_
>>
>>> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
>>> action!
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] tel:%2B2348035233535
> [2] http://goog_1872880453
> [3] https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170905/94b5901e/attachment.html>


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list