[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] Re: Input needed - review of examples - deadline 15 October

Daniel Dardailler danield at w3.org
Tue Sep 26 15:21:38 UTC 2017


On 2017-09-26 15:28, Marika Konings wrote:
> Daniel, with regard to the second part of your question, the Open
> Internet definition, note that a small drafting team was formed during
> the last meeting to review the latest version, consider all input
> received to date and come back with a proposed draft to the CCWG in
> time for the next meeting.

Ah OK, thanks.

> 
> In relation to your suggestion, instead of using these to evaluate the
> current examples, these may be criteria that the CCWG may want to
> discuss as additional guidance in relation to the objectives?

Maybe those are indeed useful to evaluate the criteria of an Open and 
Interoperable Internet, with a focus on technical merits vs. 
social/political ones (global effect, scalability and stability being 
good criteria for interoperability).


> E.g.
> priority is to be given to projects that have a global vs. local
> benefit / long-term vs. short term results, etc? I’m not clear on what
> the value would be at this stage to add these columns as the current
> exercise is focused on determining what is considered to be within
> scope of ICANN’s mission / the proposed objectives for fund allocation
> and not within scope – it is not about prioritizing the type of
> projects eligible for funding. That may be a later exercise, but not
> one we are undertaking now as far as I know.

I think we need to wait for the Open Internet definition to stabilize to 
see what is an objective and how prioritization will work on that basis.

Thanks.

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> On 9/26/17, 02:16, "Daniel Dardailler" <danield at w3.org> wrote:
> 
>     Hello Marika, all
> 
>     Looking at the examples table, and remembering the discussions at 
> our
>     last call wrt adding more columns, I wanted to suggest the 
> following
>     additional criteria (which I wrote a while ago before we started 
> the
>     CCWG). They are somehow different than the ones we already have
>     indirectly included in the second column (identifier related, 
> capacity
>     building, open Internet).
> 
>     - global vs. local benefits
>        (e.g. is this funding going to help all Internet users or just a
>     limited population ?)
>     - long-term vs. short-term results
>        (e.g. infrastructure oriented vs. event oriented)
>     - scaling effect of deliverables
>        (e.g. ratio of fund granted over expected end-users 
> benefits/saving)
>     - difficulty to get funded by other grant agencies
>        (e.g. by government programs, large foundations).
> 
> 
>     I'd be in favor of extending the current table with those criteria 
> and
>     also present the 3 pieces of the second column, so that examples 
> are
>     easier to evaluate.
> 
>     Regarding the Open Internet definition, at
> 
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1HV3dzTkKIYCyiRbzPW3Uk3MctwK0BQTth39DitIW-2DL4_edit&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=e_YwfWbrp_91FMyIWsvqRHB45Q6GM8hxiAl02nddhz0&s=ijyUxMe8bDPvURTFNXe6qD1CJU8xEcz8I7gxdNP7Dqs&e=
> 
>     I'm not sure what is the status of this page. It's still pretty 
> drafty,
>     with typos, duplicates, etc.
> 
>     Is someone in charge of cleaning it or am I not looking at the 
> right one
>     ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     On 2017-09-26 00:13, Marika Konings wrote:
>     > Dear All,
>     >
>     > As per action item #1 of our last meeting, please find attached 
> the
>     > latest Word version of the assessment of examples of fund 
> allocation
>     > document. As noted in the document, the objective is to review 
> and
>     > analyze the examples that have been provided to date in relation 
> to
>     > new gTLD Auction Proceeds allocation. As ultimately allocation 
> needs
>     > to occur consistent with ICANN’s mission as well as the 
> objectives
>     > set by the CCWG, you are requested to indicate for each of these
>     > examples with which part of ICANN’s mission it is considered
>     > consistent as well as which part of the proposed objectives. You 
> may
>     > also indicate if you do not consider the proposed example 
> consistent
>     > with either ICANN’s mission and/or the objectives. You also have 
> the
>     > ability to add examples currently not covered to the table. To
>     > facilitate your review, ICANN’s mission as well as the CCWG 
> proposed
>     > objectives are listed with reference numbers that you can use to 
> fill
>     > out the table. Note that ‘notes/comments’ column can be used for
>     > any additional input you wish to provide.
>     >
>     > You can include your feedback in the attached document or use the
>     > google doc version
>     >
> (_https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1zQ66hCxrboAJPKeuU6nHwzHQwmU6g-5F3kS0JUSSC-5FtSk_edit-5F&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=e_YwfWbrp_91FMyIWsvqRHB45Q6GM8hxiAl02nddhz0&s=SBPkWhc_JQ1x0tDrEz1VN1jW_Y9SOFXlDP6epKQoG5I&e=
> ).
>     > The deadline for input is 15 October.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >
>     > Marika_ _
>     >
>     > _ _
>     >
>     > _MARIKA KONINGS_
>     >
>     > _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
>     > Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>     >
>     > _Email: marika.konings at icann.org  _
>     >
>     > _ _
>     >
>     > _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>     >
>     > _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses 
> [1]
>     > and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Links:
>     > ------
>     > [1]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=e_YwfWbrp_91FMyIWsvqRHB45Q6GM8hxiAl02nddhz0&s=dc5FkSIROVzVknL9TcvDc2MDDEw0CznJlHFIF0ugHT0&e=
>     > [2]
>     >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=e_YwfWbrp_91FMyIWsvqRHB45Q6GM8hxiAl02nddhz0&s=m4tgJdfOqH_J-1la8pwVLz031p1ab8AAdF-Fe57boNg&e=
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>     > Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>     > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list