[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] My initial comments

[Erika Mann]

Dear Robert -

to clarify your last item. There's no intention to delay anything and I
don't expect a delay to happen.

Looking forward seeing you hopefully in Barcelona!

Warmest regards,
Erika

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
wrote:

> Seun,
>
> As it wasn’t implied in my earlier comments, I don’t personally have  an
> issue with a portion of the auction proceeds going to replenish the reserve.
>
> Where I am concerned is the pace and progress of the ccwg. a great deal of
> impact is possible, but the more we delay, the more the assumptions  of
> what is in mission and identified as a priority may change
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
>
> --
> Robert Guerra
>
> On October 24, 2018 at 3:19:45 PM, Seun Ojedeji (seun.ojedeji at gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Robert,
>>
>> Not disagreeing with you about the time this ccwg has taken but I don't
>> think it's the avenue that was used to "spend the money for us".
>>
>> I believe right from the start of this process it was clearly envisaged
>> that there will be replenishment of the reserve from the auction proceeds
>> and I think the proposed way forward is fair enough. Unless there is
>> another transition in future a precedence as this may not re-occur.
>>
>> Regards
>> PS: I think it will have been better to have replied to this message of
>> the Chair or at least include her message in the new thread you've created,
>> for thread archive completeness purposes
>>
>> Sent from my mobile
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, 13:30 Robert Guerra, <rguerra at privaterra.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Erika,
>>>
>>> Thanks for informing us of the meet you had with the icann chair and
>>> details of the board resolution .
>>>
>>> as a newcomer to this CCWG, a long time participant at ICANN and a
>>> background in working with donors to support and promote internet related
>>> projects related to security and policy development I see this action as an
>>> important precedent.
>>>
>>>  It sends a signal that if it that if we can’t get things moving quicker
>>> - in a timely fashion that is consistent with ICANN’s mission, in a way
>>> that follows legal frameworks for US entities, and addressing real needs ,
>>> then the funding might be spent for us. That’s a real concern that should
>>> not be underestimated
>>>
>>> While I recognize a lot of important work and discussions have been
>>> undertaken by this ccwg, we have also taken a period of time that is far
>>> too long given the great needs that exist to maintain  a stable, secure and
>>> interoperable  internet
>>>
>>> I look forward to meeting some of you in Barcelona, hopefully at the
>>> gala tonight as well working with you virtually in the coming weeks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20181024/ef04a94d/attachment.html>