[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] [Ext] Re: For your review - updated language in relation to individual appeals mechanism

[Sam Lanfranco]

I endorse Marika's argument for including the rationale in the first 
paragraph.

Sam L.

On 8/26/2019 10:04 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>
> Thanks, Judith but deleting the last sentence from the first paragraph 
> removes the rationale for the CCWG’s recommendation to not provide 
> access to ICANN accountability mechanisms such as IRP. It may be 
> important for readers to have this context to understand the CCWG’s 
> recommendation? Also as a reminder, these two paragraphs do not 
> immediately follow each other in the report.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
>
-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honored in an
  unjust state" -Confucius
  邦有道，贫且贱焉，耻也。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus), Econ, York U., CANADA
email: sam at lanfranco.net   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20190826/c1a9d70e/attachment.html>