[ChineseGP] 答复: 答复: Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

[王伟]

Dear Prof. Kim

 

         How’s everything going?

 

         Do you have any updates on the disagreed variants?

If KGP could provide more detailed semantics of those characters, it will help us to have a better understand of the difference in different language environment.

 

         Looking forward to your reply.

 

Best Regards

Wang Wei

 

         

 

发件人: 王伟 [mailto:wangwei at cnic.cn] 
发送时间: 2015年10月19日 23:03
收件人: 'KIM Kyongsok'
抄送: '박민정'; '박신영'; 'Dongman Lee'; '김 민지'
主题: 答复: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

 

Dear Prof. Kim

 

         Thanks for the updates

 

         is this possible for KGP to give us the information about meaning difference or sound difference of these code points?

         Like 机（desk）and 機 （machine）

 

 

Wang Wei

 

发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0 at gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2015年10月19日 16:17
收件人: 王伟
抄送: KIM Kyongsok; 박민정; 박신영; Dongman Lee; 김 민지
主题: Re: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

 

Dear Mr. WANG:

 

Enclosed you will find four sheets.

The last sheet has data now.

 

Hear is a summary of our review:

 

2015.10.18.

Korea's position # variant groups

Acceptable 44

Partially Acceptable   1

Unacceptable             258

total                         303

 

Thanks.

 

Rgds,

 

KIM, K.

 

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:49 PM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0 at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Wang:

 

Nice to hear from you again....

 

 

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:41 PM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:

Dear Prof. Kim


In your document

2.2  141 C variant groups: Not Acceptable
  - "Since the characters in C variant groups are NOT variants.  The characters in C variant groups have different meaning and/or sound."
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you mean "The characters in C variant groups are Not variant [in K language environment] " ??

 

Right.  Exactly.

 

 

                                                                                                        -----------------------------------------


2.3 135 to be reviewed
How's the review going? Have you get the final conclusion?

 

Sorry.  We made a conclusion.

 

Enclosed you will find four sheets.

However the last sheet does not have data yet.

 

I will send a completed sheet tomorrow.

 

Hear is a summary of our review:

 

2015.10.18.

Korea's position # variant groups

Acceptable 44

Partially Acceptable   1

Unacceptable             258

total                              303

 

 

Thanks...

 

KIM, K.

 




-----邮件原件-----
发件人: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] 代表 KIM Kyongsok
发送时间: 2015年9月16日 15:02
收件人: chinesegp at icann.org
抄送: JapaneseGP at icann.org; koreanGP at icann.org; KIM Kyongsok
主题: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups


Dear CGP members:

Enclosed you will find Korea's
Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups.

Korea will appreciate if CGP would read Korea's review and respond with comments.

Thanks in advance.

Rgds,

KIM, K.

-----------------------------

Source: KLGP (Korean Language General Panel)

Date: 2015.09.10.

Subject: Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

Action Requested for CGP: Please review this document and respond with comments


--
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok





 

-- 

김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok





 

-- 

김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/chinesegp/attachments/20151205/61f1b9cc/attachment.html>