[ChineseGP] 答复: 答复: Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups

[KIM Kyongsok]

Dear Mr. Wang:

I will check with my colleague experts and
will let you know.

Thanks.

KIM, K.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:28 AM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
> Dear Prof. Kim
>
>
>
>          How’s everything going?
>
>
>
>          Do you have any updates on the disagreed variants?
>
> If KGP could provide more detailed semantics of those characters, it will
> help us to have a better understand of the difference in different language
> environment.
>
>
>
>          Looking forward to your reply.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Wang Wei
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 发件人: 王伟 [mailto:wangwei at cnic.cn]
> 发送时间: 2015年10月19日 23:03
> 收件人: 'KIM Kyongsok'
> 抄送: '박민정'; '박신영'; 'Dongman Lee'; '김 민지'
> 主题: 答复: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups
>
>
>
> Dear Prof. Kim
>
>
>
>          Thanks for the updates
>
>
>
>          is this possible for KGP to give us the information about meaning
> difference or sound difference of these code points?
>
>          Like 机（desk）and 機 （machine）
>
>
>
>
>
> Wang Wei
>
>
>
> 发件人: KIM Kyongsok [mailto:gimgs0 at gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2015年10月19日 16:17
> 收件人: 王伟
> 抄送: KIM Kyongsok; 박민정; 박신영; Dongman Lee; 김 민지
> 主题: Re: 答复: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. WANG:
>
>
>
> Enclosed you will find four sheets.
>
> The last sheet has data now.
>
>
>
> Hear is a summary of our review:
>
>
>
> 2015.10.18.
>
> Korea's position # variant groups
>
> Acceptable 44
>
> Partially Acceptable   1
>
> Unacceptable             258
>
> total                         303
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Rgds,
>
>
>
> KIM, K.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:49 PM, KIM Kyongsok <gimgs0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Mr. Wang:
>
>
>
> Nice to hear from you again....
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:41 PM, 王伟 <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
>
> Dear Prof. Kim
>
>
> In your document
>
> 2.2  141 C variant groups: Not Acceptable
>   - "Since the characters in C variant groups are NOT variants.  The
> characters in C variant groups have different meaning and/or sound."
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Do you mean "The characters in C variant groups are Not variant [in K
> language environment] " ??
>
>
>
> Right.  Exactly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
> 2.3 135 to be reviewed
> How's the review going? Have you get the final conclusion?
>
>
>
> Sorry.  We made a conclusion.
>
>
>
> Enclosed you will find four sheets.
>
> However the last sheet does not have data yet.
>
>
>
> I will send a completed sheet tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Hear is a summary of our review:
>
>
>
> 2015.10.18.
>
> Korea's position # variant groups
>
> Acceptable 44
>
> Partially Acceptable   1
>
> Unacceptable             258
>
> total                              303
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks...
>
>
>
> KIM, K.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] 代表 KIM
> Kyongsok
> 发送时间: 2015年9月16日 15:02
> 收件人: chinesegp at icann.org
> 抄送: JapaneseGP at icann.org; koreanGP at icann.org; KIM Kyongsok
> 主题: [ChineseGP] Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups
>
>
> Dear CGP members:
>
> Enclosed you will find Korea's
> Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups.
>
> Korea will appreciate if CGP would read Korea's review and respond with
> comments.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rgds,
>
> KIM, K.
>
> -----------------------------
>
> Source: KLGP (Korean Language General Panel)
>
> Date: 2015.09.10.
>
> Subject: Review of K (Korean) and C (Chinese) variant groups
>
> Action Requested for CGP: Please review this document and respond with
> comments
>
>
> --
> 김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok



-- 
김 경석      KIM, Kyongsok