[ChineseGP] CJK Joint meeting record and homework

[HiroHOTTA]

Dear Wang Wei, Prof. Kim, Kenny, and all CJK colleagues,

In Beijing, we decided to renumber our action items by 
inserting previous action items into Beijing action item 
list.
If you don't have any concerns, JGP can take the role of 
this renumbering task and sending you the new action item 
list in a couple of days.
Any concerns?

Regards,
Hiro

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:18:27 +0800
王? <wangwei at cnic.cn> wrote:
> Dear All
> 
> 	Please find the attached documents of meeting agenda & record, and
> the action item (homework)
> 
> 	Thanks everyone who join the meeting in the two days. We will keep
> working on it.
> 
> 
> Regards
> WANG Wei
> 
> -----?件原件-----
> ?件人: chinesegp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:chinesegp-bounces at icann.org] 代
> 表 HiroHOTTA
> ?送??: 2016年3月21日 8:53
> 收件人: ChineseGP at icann.org; JapaneseGP at icann.org; KoreanGP at icann.org
> 主?: [ChineseGP] how 'blocked' can help us
> 
> (During 4 hours struggle with the letters without significant  output ...)
> 
> A question has come to my mind and won't disappear...
> 
> What are the future of "allocatable labels"?
> 
> Let's assume the case where
>   registrant-X applied for label-A,
>   and label-B is marked as 'allocatable' by LGR,
>   then, label-A is delegated to registrant-X.
> 
> As far as I understand, the above means "only registrant-X has the right to
> apply for label-B in the future." If registrant-X wants label-B to be
> delegated, he/she needs to make a separate application to ICANN. And ICANN
> will evaluate the label-B by a human panel (maybe supported by some
> automatic mechanism).
> 
> Then, what's the difference between
> (1) all variants are allocatable
> (2) some variants are allocatable and the others are blocked 
>     (or invalid)
> 
> I understand (2) can make the applicant know that the application for some
> strings (that are blocked/invalid) will definitely be rejected in any case.
> However, this does not reduce the number of TLD delegations significantly
> because the applicant does want only a few variant TLDs in reality, for
> money-wise reason or usage-wise reason. 
> 
> then,,,,, why is (1) so evil?
> 
> Hiro
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ChineseGP mailing list
> ChineseGP at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/chinesegp